目的 了解安徽省医疗机构丙型病毒性肝炎病例报告的质量。方法 抽取丙型病毒性肝炎病例报告数较多的7家不同等级医院,对抽取医院2018年7月1日至2019年6月30日报告的确诊病例、急性病例和丙肝病毒核酸阳性者进行核查,分析病例误报率、漏报率和核酸阳性报告正确率。结果 共核查丙肝确诊病例828例,确诊病例总误报率为46.9%(388/828),其中三级医院确诊病例误报率(46.7%)略低于二级医院(47.6%)(χ2=0.030,P=0.862)。核查丙肝急性病例198例,急性病例总误报率为76.8%(152/198),其中三级医院急性病例误报率(69.2%)明显低于二级医院(96.4%)(χ2=16.397,P＜0.001)。检验科检出的1 031例丙肝病毒核酸阳性者中,480例未上报至传染病报告信息管理系统,总漏报率为46.6%,其中三级医院漏报率(49.7%)明显高于二级医院(2.9%)(χ2=57.639,P＜0.001);丙肝病毒核酸阳性病例报告正确率为91.7%(505/551),其中三级医院报告正确率(92.5%)明显高于二级医院(85.3%)(χ2=4.098,P=0.043)。结论 安徽省部分医疗机构丙肝病例报告质量不高,应加强医疗机构丙肝诊断标准和报告要求的培训和考核,减少丙肝误报与漏报。
Abstract
Objective To understand the reporting quality of hepatitis C cases in medical institutions of Anhui Province. Methods Seven hospitals of different levels with a large number of reports of hepatitis C cases were selected.The confirmed cases of hepatitis C,acute cases,and hepatitis C virus nucleic acid positive cases reported by the selected hospitals from July 1,2018 to June 30,2019 were checked.The mistaken report rate,missing report rate and reporting accuracy rate of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid positive cases were calculated. Results A total of 828 confirmed cases of hepatitis C were checked.The overall mistaken report rate of confirmed cases was 46.9% (388/828).The mistaken report rate of confirmed cases in tertiary hospitals (46.7%) was significantly lower than that in secondary hospitals (47.6%) (χ2=0.030,P=0.862).A total of 198 acute cases of hepatitis C were checked,with the overall mistaken report rate of 76.8% (152/198).The mistaken report rate of acute cases in tertiary hospitals (69.2%) was significantly lower than that in secondary hospitals (96.4%) (χ2=16.397,P＜0.001).Among 1 031 cases of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid positive that detected from the laboratory,480 cases were not reported to the infectious disease report information management system.The overall missing report rate of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid positive cases was 46.6%.The missing report rate in tertiary hospitals (49.7%) was significantly higher than that in secondary hospitals (2.9%) (χ2=57.639,P＜0.001).The reporting accuracy rate of hepatitis C virus nucleic acid positive cases was 91.7% (505/551),with a significantly higher rate in tertiary hospitals (92.5%) than that in secondary hospitals (85.3%) (χ2=4.098,P=0.043). Conclusion The reporting quality of hepatitis C cases in some medical institutions of Anhui Province is not high.It is necessary to strengthen the training and assessment on diagnosis criteria and reporting of hepatitis C in medical institutions to reduce misreporting and underreporting of hepatitis C.
关键词
丙型病毒性肝炎 /
病例报告 /
数据质量 /
传染病网络报告
Key words
Viral hepatitis C /
Case report /
Data quality /
Infectious disease network report
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 施小明,马家奇,王丽萍,等.2005年全国医疗机构法定传染病漏报情况调查分析[J].疾病监测,2006,21(9):493-496.
[2] 马莉珍,罗湘蜀,杨长虹,等.2015年四川省医疗机构传染病漏报情况调查[J].预防医学情报杂志,2017,33(3):247-251.
[3] 薛宏伟.2010年法定传染病漏报调查分析[J].中国农村卫生,2015,8(62):35.
[4] 李永盛,马斌忠,石燕,等.青海省2009—2011年医疗机构法定传染病漏报调查[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(2):340-342.
[5] 赵玉秋,邓舒,邱彦.安徽省2016年法定传染病报告质量和管理现状评估[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2017,23(4):221-226.
[6] 黑发欣,白广义,李洁,等.2013 年我国部分地区丙型病毒性肝炎病例报告数据质量抽查分析[J].疾病监测,2014,29(7):574-577.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.中华人民共和国卫生行业标准:《丙型肝炎诊断(WS 213-2018)》.2018-03-06[R/OL].
[8] 黑发欣,庞琳,王晓春,等.2013—2015 年我国丙型病毒性肝炎病例报告数据质量核查分析[J].疾病监测,2017,32(6):513-515.
[9] 吴韶彬,张明雅,林丽,等.福建省4市2014年丙肝报告质量分析[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2016,22(5):17-19.
[10] 李化荣.焦作市2014—2016 年丙肝病例报告质量及感染危险因素调查[J].医药论坛杂志,2017,38(8):57-59.
[11] 裴晓迪,刘伦皓,刘莉,等.2014 年四川省丙型病毒性肝炎病例报告数据质量核查结果分析[J].职业卫生与病伤,2018,33(6):348-351.
[12] 何海艳,吴伟慎,李超,等.天津市医疗机构丙肝病例诊断及报告质量现况调查[J].现代预防医学,2016,43(18):3366-3369.
PDF(841 KB)
