芜湖市三山经济开发区卫生监督“双随机”监管机制运行现状分析

许方, 张清, 倪凯

安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 413-416.

PDF(741 KB)
PDF(741 KB)
安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5) : 413-416. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.05.016
卫生监督与监测

芜湖市三山经济开发区卫生监督“双随机”监管机制运行现状分析

  • 许方1, 张清1, 倪凯2
作者信息 +

Analysis of the current operation status of the "Double Random" supervision mechanism for health supervision in Sanshan Economic Development Zone,Wuhu City

  • XU Fang1, ZHANG Qing1, NI Kai2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析芜湖市三山经济开发区 “双随机”监督数据,了解 “双随机”监管机制运行现状及存在问题,为完善卫生监督“双随机”监管机制提供科学依据。方法 对2019—2023年芜湖市三山经济开发区卫生监督“双随机”监督抽查数据和日常监督数据进行对比分析,计算相关指标,采用SPSS 25.0进行统计学分析。结果 2019—2023年芜湖市三山经济开发区“双随机”监督任务为179户次,实际监督177户次,任务完成率为98.89%,平均任务抽取比例为8.70%,工作量占总体监督工作量的5.25%,监督合格率为14.12%;处罚案件21起,处罚率为13.82%。2019—2023年三山经济开发区日常监督3 197户次,合格1 045户次,合格率为32.69%;处罚案件72起,处罚率为3.35%。结论 “双随机”监管机制可以提高监管效能,在基层实施过程中仍存在一定的问题与不足,需要不断调整和优化。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the "double random" supervision data of the Sanshan Economic Development Zone in Wuhu City,understand the current operation status and existing problems of the "double random" supervision mechanism,and provide the scientific basis for improving the "double random" supervision mechanism of health supervision. Methods Comparative analysis was conducted on the "double random" supervision sampling data and daily supervision data of health supervision in Sanshan Economic Development Zone,Wuhu City from 2019 to 2023.Relevant indicators were calculated and statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0. Results From 2019 to 2023,the "double random" supervision tasks in Sanshan Economic Development Zone,Wuhu City were 179 households,with 177 households supervised.The task completion rate was 98.89%,and the average task extraction ratio was 8.70%.The workload accounted for 5.25% of the overall supervision workload,with a supervision qualification rate of 14.12%.There were 21 penalty cases and a punishment rate of 13.82%.From 2019 to 2023,the daily supervision of 3 197 households in the Sanshan Economic Development Zone resulted in 1 045 households passing the inspection,with a qualification rate of 32.69%.There were 72 penalty cases,with a punishment rate of 3.35%. Conclusion Although the "double random" regulatory mechanism can improve regulatory efficiency,there are still certain problems and shortcomings in the implementation process at the grassroots level,which need to be continuously adjusted and optimized.

关键词

卫生监督 / “双随机”监督抽查 / 现状分析

Key words

Health supervision / "Double random"supervision and random inspection / Current situation analysis

引用本文

导出引用
许方, 张清, 倪凯. 芜湖市三山经济开发区卫生监督“双随机”监管机制运行现状分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志. 2024, 30(5): 413-416 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.05.016
XU Fang, ZHANG Qing, NI Kai. Analysis of the current operation status of the "Double Random" supervision mechanism for health supervision in Sanshan Economic Development Zone,Wuhu City[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024, 30(5): 413-416 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.05.016
中图分类号: R19   

参考文献

[1] 张杨.鹤壁市2017—2019年学校卫生“双随机一公开” 抽检结果分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2020,26(6):485-487.
[2] 董振军,冯冬颖,尹俊清,等.2017—2019年河北省放射卫生“双随机” 抽查结果分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2020,29(3):297-301.
[3] 全国推行“双随机、一公开” 监管工作电视电话会议召开 [N].人民日报,2016-09-22(1).
[4] 谈立峰,褚苏春,杨琴亚,等.常州市卫生监督“双随机” 抽查工作现状分析及对策探讨[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2019,26(4):336-342.
[5] 陈瑜.北京卫生计生监督“双随机” 监管机制的探讨[J].中国卫生法制,2019,27(6):65-68.
[6] 濮剑虹,倪川明,胡慧琴.“双随机、一公开” 监管模式在卫生计生基层执法工作中的实践与应用[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2019,26(1):33-38.

PDF(741 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/