目的 了解福建省现场流行病学培训项目(FJFETP)的培训效果,为进一步完善现场流行病学培训项目(FETP)工作提供参考。方法 对2020—2024年福建省FETP 104名毕业学员进行问卷调查,采用R.4.4.1软件进行数据整理和统计分析。结果 福建省2020—2024年共举办5期FETP,毕业学员104人,覆盖全省9个市、1个综合实验区和63个县(市、区),县(市、区)覆盖率达73.26%(63/86)。104名毕业学员中,67.31%(70/104)来自县(市、区)级疾病预防控制中心,98.08%(102/104)认为培训后整体工作能力得到了提升,42.31%(44/104)选择省疾病预防控制中心作为培训期间现场实践最佳地点,95.19%(99/104)选择疾控机构专业技术人员作为理论学习期间授课老师。在八种能力提升评价中,“发生疾病暴发或紧急卫生事件时,独立组织开展较复杂的现场流行病学调查的能力”得分最高,为7.46分。培训后知识问卷得分为(71.50±22.60)分,高于培训前得分[(42.30±20.00)分],差异有统计学意义(t=9.864,P<0.001)。结论 FJFETP毕业学员整体工作能力获得较大提升,尚需进一步完善培训师资、培训模式和经费保障机制,确保FJFETP高质量推进。
Abstract
Objective To understand the training effectiveness and training needs of the Fujian Province Field Epidemiology Training Program (FJFETP),and provide reference for further improving FETP. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 104 graduated trainees of the FETP in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024.and R.4.4.1 software was used for data organization and statistical analysis. Results A total of 5 FETP sessions were held in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024,with 104 graduates,covering 9 cities,1 comprehensive experimental zone,and 63 counties (cities,districts) in the province.The coverage rate of counties (cities,districts) reached 73.26% (63/86).Among the 104 graduating students,67.31% (70 /104) came from the county (city,district) level CDC,98.08% (102/104) believed that their overall work ability had been improved after the training,42.31% (44/104) chose the Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention as the best spot to practice on-site during the training period,and 95.19% (99/104) chose professional and technical personnel from disease control institutions as instructors during the centralized period.Among the eight ability enhancement evaluations,"the ability to independently organize complex on-site epidemiological investigations in the event of disease outbreaks or emergency health events" scored the highest at 7.46 points.The score after training was (71.50±22.60) points,which was higher than the score before training [(42.30 ± 20.00) points],and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.864,P<0.001). Conclusion The overall work ability of FJFETP graduates has been greatly improved,and further improvements are needed in training instructors,training models,and funding guarantee mechanisms to ensure the high-quality promotion of FJFETP.
关键词
现场流行病学 /
培训 /
效果评估
Key words
Field Epidemiology /
Training /
Effectiveness evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 曾光.我国已建立中国现场流行病学培训项目[J].中华流行病学杂志,2002,23(1):67.
[2] 谭嘉.施国庆.从事现场流行病学要有一种精神[N].健康报,2015-01-09(007).
[3] 冯琳,吕梅.中国现场流行病学培训项目在公共卫生应急人才培养中的作用[J].中国公共卫生管理,2010,26(3):245-246.
[4] 吕繁,李立明.现场流行病学培训项目及其发展[J].中国预防医学杂志,2001,2(4):336-343.
[5] 吴家兵.安徽省突发急性传染病防控现状与策略展望[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2024,30(3):173-178+194.
[6] 李东悦,曾四清,李健,等.广东省现场流行病学培训项目培训效果评估[J].继续医学教育,2008,22(5):6-9.
[7] 杜莹,陈若男,于洁,等.天津市一线现场流行病学培训效果评估[J].职业与健康,2023,39(3):410-413.
[8] 卢昊,涂画.湖北省一线人员现场流行病学培训项目发展分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2024,40(2):219-221.
[9] 朱传泰,刘作功.山东省现场流行病学培训效果评价[J].预防医学论坛,2005,11(6):683-685.
[10] 宋律,侯赛,杜金,等.基于学员自评的安徽省现场流行病学培训项目效果分析[J].预防医学,2020,32(5):533-535+538.
[11] 姚兰,王志锋.贵州省现场流行病学培训效果评价[J].贵州医药,2011,35(11):1027-1029.
[12] 陈奕,许国章,史玮,等.宁波市现场流行病学培训项目效果评价[J].中国公共卫生管理,2012,28(1):30-31.
[13] 王安娜,赵芳芳,冀国强,等.北京市顺义区现场流行病学培训项目效果评价[J].首都公共卫生,2016,10(5):238-240.
[14] 杨莉.中国现场流行病学培训项目责任导师制实施现状调查[D].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2019.
[15] 曹宁,高玉敏,李海玲,等.案例教学法在现场流行病学中的应用[J].基础医学教育,2022,24(5):326-329.
基金
福建省卫生健康中青年领军人才研修培养项目资助
PDF(744 KB)
