PDF(805 KB)
清镇市2023年青少年学生烟草使用现状及影响因素分析
朱海燕, 郭雪丽, 陈婷, 魏德祥, 陈燕, 邵书会
安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1) : 44-50.
PDF(805 KB)
PDF(805 KB)
清镇市2023年青少年学生烟草使用现状及影响因素分析
Analysis of the status quo and influencing factors of tobacco use among adolescent students in Qingzhen City in 2023
目的 分析2023年清镇市青少年烟草使用现状及其影响因素,为提出针对性的控烟措施提供参考依据。方法 采用多阶段分层整群概率抽样法,在清镇市全市共抽取876名初中、高中、职高在校学生进行自填问卷调查,包括烟草使用,二手烟暴露等情况。采用多因素logistic回归分析青少年尝试吸烟、现在吸烟及烟草易感的影响因素。结果 清镇市青少年尝试吸烟率为16.32%,现在吸烟率为5.48%,烟草易感率为4.91%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,好友吸烟(OR=6.496,95%CI:3.884~10.866)、校园内教师吸烟(OR=1.856,95%CI:1.128~3.053)、班级同学吸烟(OR=3.698,95%CI:1.548~8.834)是尝试吸烟的危险因素;好友吸烟(OR=59.164,95%CI:7.982~438.541)是现在吸烟的危险因素;好友吸烟(OR=3.366,95%CI:1.551~7.304)、校园内教师吸烟(OR=3.420,95%CI:1.376~8.503)是烟草易感的危险因素。结论 清镇市青少年烟草使用情况不容乐观,同伴效应及校园内教师吸烟是青少年吸烟的重要影响因素。
Objective To analyze the current situation and influencing factors of tobacco use among adolescents in Qingzhen City in 2023,and provide a reference for proposing targeted tobacco control measures. Methods The multi-stage stratified cluster probability sampling method was used to conduct a self-filled questionnaire survey among 876 middle school,high school,and vocational high school students in Qingzhen City,including tobacco use and second-hand smoke exposure.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for the study of adolescent attempt smoking,current smoking,and tobacco susceptibility factors. Results The attempted smoking rate of adolescents in Qingzhen City was 16.32%,the current smoking rate was 5.48%,and the tobacco susceptibility rate was 4.91%.The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking among friends(OR=6.496,95%CI:3.884-10.866),smoking among teachers on campus (OR=1.856,95%CI:1.128-3.053),and smoking among classmates (OR=3.698,95%CI:1.548-8.834) were risk factors for trying smoking.Smoking among friends (OR=59.164,95%CI:7.982-438.541) was the risk factor for current smoking.Smoking among friends (OR=3.366,95%CI:1.551-7.304) and smoking among teachers on campus (OR=3.420,95%CI:1.376-8.503) were risk factors for tobacco susceptibility. Conclusion The tobacco use of teenagers in Qingzhen City is not optimistic.Peer effect and smoking among teachers on campus are important factors affecting adolescent smoking.
Adolescent students / Tobacco prevalence / Influencing factors
| [1] |
肖琳. 中国青少年烟草使用现状研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2016(9):85-89.
|
| [2] |
陈仕学, 胡阳, 黄昕, 等. 2019年海口市青少年烟草暴露及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2022, 38(10):927-931.
|
| [3] |
杨纲, 张馨航, 王娇, 等. 北京市通州区青少年烟草使用状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2022, 38(9):837-840.
|
| [4] |
周培静, 胡毅, 刘婷, 等. 2019年山东省青少年烟草使用现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(11):970-974+983.
|
| [5] |
马鸿玲, 刘梅, 普世传, 等. 2021年云南省青少年烟草使用情况及影响因素分析[J]. 首都公共卫生, 2023, 17(4):197-201.
|
| [6] |
朱泽善, 鲁培俊, 王力. 甘肃省青少年烟草使用现状及影响因素分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2015, 28(12):46-48.
|
| [7] |
高颖, 孙乐成, 王莉莉, 等. 海南省青少年烟草使用现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(9):690-693.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
赵加奎, 林军, 陆瑛, 等. 2019年上海市黄浦区青少年烟草流行状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(4):358-362.
|
| [10] |
徐小冬, 张玫, 叶茜雯, 等. 大连市青少年吸烟行为现状及尝试吸烟影响因素分析[J]. 中国校医, 2023, 37(7):500-503.
|
| [11] |
韩娟, 郭明, 张敏, 等. 2021年定州市青少年烟草使用现况及影响因素分析[J]. 医学动物防制, 2024, 40(1):45-50.
|
| [12] |
林竹, 陈梅兰, 陈锦辉. 2019年福建省青少年学生吸烟行为的调查分析[J]. 中国健康教育, 2021, 37(11):975-978.
|
| [13] |
To explore the prevalence and the demographic predictors of nonmedical use of opioid analgesics in the Canadian adolescent population.Data are based on self-reports derived from the 2007 Ontario Student Drug Use and Health Survey, which is an anonymous, in-school, cross-sectional survey.Schools in Ontario.A total of 2914 students in grades 7 to 12.Demographic predictors of nonmedical use of opioid analgesics during the past year and the sources of opioid analgesics.Students ranged in age from 12 to 19 years (mean 15.0, SD 1.9) and 52% were male. Of the students surveyed, 20.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.9% to 22.3%) reported using opioid analgesics at least once nonmedically during the past year, with 6.2% using exclusively nonmedically and 14.4% using nonmedically and medically. Female students (16.6%, CI 14.1% to 19.6%) were more likely than male students (12.0%, CI 10.0% to 14.2%) to have used opioid analgesics both nonmedically and medically in the past year, although exclusive nonmedical use was similar between female (6.7%, CI 5.3% to 8.5%) and male (5.8%, CI 4.5% to 7.3%) students. Among students who reported using opioid analgesics nonmedically, 72% reported obtaining them from home and only 6% reported obtaining them from friends. Nonmedical opioid analgesic users had higher past-year prevalences for alcohol use, daily smoking, and other illicit drug use compared with nonusers.Nonmedical use of opioids is common among Ontario students. The motivation for using these medications without prescriptions or without medical supervision is not known. Students might have used these medications recreationally or for pain relief. Regardless of motivation, these medications are being used without medical supervision. It is important to note that the home is the main source for opioid analgesics in the absence of a prescription. Parents should be vigilant and educate themselves and their children about these medications, ensuring that prescription opioids are stored properly and avoiding casual sharing of these medications among family members.
|
| [14] |
郭带好. 浅析中等职业学校学生压力的形成及应对机制[J]. 现代职业教育, 2016(5):184.
|
| [15] |
罗彦, 夏庆华, 余惠红, 等. 湖北省青少年烟草使用现况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2017, 38(5):670-672+675.
|
| [16] |
文孝忠, 陈维清, 梁彩花, 等. 健康促进学校干预模式对学校和家庭控烟环境的影响[J]. 中国学校卫生, 2007, 28(3):207-209.
|
| [17] |
吴红花, 夏仕银, 刘刚, 等. 安徽某高校大学生结核病防治知信行现状及健康需求调查[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2023, 29(3):237-241.
|
| [18] |
余夕梅, 张琦, 罗时艳, 等. 浦口区2020—2021学年中小学生常见病及营养状况结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2022, 28(2):111-113+144.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
