PDF(731 KB)
PDF(731 KB)
PDF(731 KB)
昆明市某区2019—2023年城乡居民生活饮用水水质监测结果分析
Analysis of monitoring results of drinking water quality for urban and rural residents in a district of Kunming from 2019 to 2023
目的 了解2019—2023年昆明市某区城乡生活饮用水水质,为相关部门提供决策依据。方法 按照《生活饮用水标准检验方法》(GB/T 5750—2006)对昆明市某区49个饮用水监测点进行采样和检测,依据《生活饮用水卫生标准》对检测结果进行评价,计算合格率,采用SPSS 21.0进行统计学分析。结果 2019—2023年昆明市某区共监测水样437份,合格率为82.61%。2019—2023年水样合格率分别为78.46%、81.25%、78.64%、91.21%和82.65%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=6.695,P=0.153)。出厂水和末梢水合格率分别为70.59%、84.46%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.094,P=0.014);枯水期和丰水期水样合格率分别为82.63%、82.59%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.000,P=0.991);城市水和农村水合格率分别为96.65%、20.25%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=265.675,P<0.001)。不合格项目中前3位指标分别为总大肠菌群、大肠埃希氏菌和菌落总数。结论 昆明市某区城区生活饮用水水质好于农村地区,微生物指标合格率低,应加强农村饮用水卫生监督监测,确保饮水安全。
Objective To understand the water quality of urban and rural drinking water in a district of Kunming from 2019 to 2023,and to provide decision-making basis for relevant departments. Methods Sampling and testing were conducted on 49 drinking water monitoring points in a certain district of Kunming according to the Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water (GB/T 5750-2006).The test results were evaluated based on the Standards for Drinking Water Quality,and the qualified rate was calculated.Statistical analysis was conducted by using SPSS 21.0. Results From 2019 to 2023,a total of 437 water samples were monitored in a district of Kunming,with a qualified rate of 82.61%.The qualified rates of water samples from 2019 to 2023 were 78.46%,81.25%,78.64%,91.21% and 82.65%,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (χ2=6.695,P=0.153).The qualified rates of factory water and terminal water were 70.59% and 84.46%,respectively,with statistically significant difference (χ2=6.094,P=0.014).The qualified rates of water samples during the dry season and wet season were 82.63% and 82.59%,respectively,with no statistically significant difference (χ2=0.000,P=0.991).The qualified rates of urban water and rural water were 96.65% and 20.25%,respectively,with statistically significant difference (χ2=265.675,P<0.001).The top three indicators in the unqualified items were total coliforms,Escherichia coli,and total bacterial count. Conclusion The quality of drinking water in urban areas of a certain district in Kunming is better than that in rural areas,with low qualified rate of microbial indicators.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the supervision and monitoring of rural drinking water quality to ensure the safety of drinking water.
Drinking water / Water quality monitoring / Urban-rural differences / Qualified rate
| [1] |
时希杰, 肖新建, 杨道玲. 着力提升城市饮用水品质[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2023(3):74-82+90.
|
| [2] |
中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 生活饮用水标准检验方法水样的采集与保存:GB/T5750.2—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
|
| [3] |
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 生活饮用水标准检验方法:GB/T 5750.1-5750.13—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
|
| [4] |
中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 生活饮用水卫生标准:GB5749—2006[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
|
| [5] |
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 生活饮用水卫生标准:GB5749—2022[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2023.
|
| [6] |
杨漳龙, 查建溪, 陈秋怀, 等. 漳州市2019—2022年农村生活饮用水监测结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2024, 30(5):407-409+426.
|
| [7] |
叶珍珍, 成慧, 卢凌, 等. 2012—2019年江西省农村生活饮用水水质卫生调查[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2021, 38(10):886-888.
|
| [8] |
乔松慧. 典型农村地区饮用水水质现状分析研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.
|
| [9] |
熊传龙, 张永, 陈志健, 等. 农村地区饮用水消毒质量及消毒前后微生物变化分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2021, 48(11):2084-2088.
|
| [10] |
王国洪, 宋冰, 李红霞, 等. 贵州省福泉市2020—2023年城乡居民饮用水水质卫生监测结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2024, 30(5):417-419+430.
|
| [11] |
韩丹丹. 饮用水水质卫生安全与介水传染病流行现状[J]. 中国校医, 2018, 32(2):158-161.
|
| [12] |
杨李桃, 邹立民, 陈锐, 等. 云南省安宁市2011年-2012年水质监测结果分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2014, 24(3):418-421.
|
| [13] |
蒋一. 2014年—2018年佳木斯市郊区农村安全饮水工程水质结果分析[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2019, 10(22):160-161+164.
|
| [14] |
冯晓亮, 王志强. 某省城市供水末梢水合格率高于出厂水原因分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2017, 7(3):209-212.
|
| [15] |
眭世闺, 曾永芳, 曾肖寒, 等. 2015—2017年贵港市农村饮用水总硬度调查[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2018, 35(10):924-925.
|
| [16] |
黎勇, 钟格梅, 黄林, 等. 广西农村饮用水水质pH指标监测结果分析[J]. 应用预防医学, 2012, 18(3):168-170.
|
| [17] |
江莲. 地表水处理工艺与残留铝含量的研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015.
|
| [18] |
覃昆飞. 生活饮用水中“三氮”(氨氮、硝酸盐氮、亚硝酸盐氮)的来源、危害及控制[N]. 山西科技报,2024-04-02(A05).
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
葛倩夏, 王安伟, 史亮晶, 等. 云南省居民饮用水氟含量调查[J]. 疾病预防控制通报, 2019, 34(1):10-12+17.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |