PDF(1845 KB)
PDF(1845 KB)
PDF(1845 KB)
蚌埠市2019—2022年农村饮用水水质综合评价
Comprehensive assessment of rural drinking water quality in Bengbu from 2019 to 2022
目的 分析蚌埠市2019—2022年农村饮用水卫生状况,为改善农村饮用水卫生状况提供科学依据。方法 收集蚌埠市2019—2022年农村生活饮用水监测数据,应用水质综合指数(WQI)评价农村饮用水水质。结果 共检测农村水样1 259份,WQI的中位数为0.63(0.52,0.76),水质优良率为94.36%,呈逐年上升趋势( =27.515,P<0.001)。枯水期水质优良率高于丰水期(χ2=9.287,P=0.020);大型供水工程(日供水≥1 000 m3)水质优良率高于小型供水工程(日供水<1 000 m3)(χ2=20.075,P<0.001);按要求使用消毒设备水质优良率高于未按要求使用(χ2=29.639,P<0.001)。影响水质卫生状况的主要指标为氟化物、耗氧量、菌落总数等。结论 蚌埠市2019—2022年农村生活饮用水水质良好,水质状况主要受水期类型、供水工程规模、消毒设备是否按要求使用的影响。
Objective To analyze the rural drinking water sanitation status in Bengbu from 2019 to 2022, and to provide scientific basis for improving the rural drinking water sanitation status. Methods The monitoring data of rural drinking water in Bengbu from 2019 to 2022 were collected, and the water quality index (WQI) was used to evaluate the quality of rural drinking water. Results A total of 1 259 rural water samples were tested, the median (P25, P75) of WQI was 0.63 (0.52, 0.76). The excellent water quality rate was 94.36%, showed an upward trend year by year (χ =27.515, P<0.001). The excellent water quality rate during the dry season was higher than that during the wet season (χ2=9.287, P=0.020). The excellent water quality rate of large-scale water supply projects (daily water supply≥1 000 m3) was higher than that of small-scale water supply projects (daily water supply<1 000 m3) (χ2=20.075, P<0.001). The excellent water quality rate of using disinfection equipment as required was higher than that of not using disinfection equipment as required (χ2=29.639, P<0.001). The main influencing indicators of water quality and sanitation status were fluoride, oxygen consumption, and total bacterial count. Conclusion The rural drinking water quality in Bengbu from 2019 to 2022 is good. The water quality is mainly affected by the type of water period, the scale of the water supply project, and whether the disinfection equipment was used as required.
农村 / 生活饮用水 / 水质综合指数 / 影响因素 / 水质评价
Rural areas / Drinking water / Water quality index / Influencing factors / Water quality assessment
| [1] |
陶勇. 农村饮用水水质卫生监测及其作用[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2022, 21(4):529-531+538.
|
| [2] |
秦岭, 朱鸿斌, 郭虹雨. 2016—2020年四川省农村饮用水供水状况和水质变化趋势分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2023, 50(4):618-622.
|
| [3] |
马蕾, 郑莉, 冯晓亮, 等. 安徽省2022年农村生活饮用水水质监测结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2023, 29(5):382-385+433.
|
| [4] |
袁东, 陈仁杰, 钱海雷, 等. 城市生活饮用水综合指数评价方法建立及其应用[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2010, 27(5):257-260.
|
| [5] |
胡苗苗, 夏云婷, 王丽, 等. 2022年西部某市农村生活饮用水水质综合评价[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2024, 14(2):151-155.
|
| [6] |
白文娟. 应用综合指数法评价武汉市生活饮用水水质[J]. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2018, 29(3):73-76.
|
| [7] |
贾建伟. 饮用水微生物监测结果分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2022, 32(10):1275-1277.
|
| [8] |
张旭辉, 张瑞仙, 狄娟, 等. 2008—2013年云南省农村饮水安全工程水质卫生监测结果分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2015, 5(1):14-19.
|
| [9] |
坑斌. 2016年—2020年北京市怀柔区生活饮用水水质监测分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2022, 32(7):885-887.
|
| [10] |
丁婷婷, 王苏玮, 安玉琴, 等. 2018—2020年河北省农村饮用水水质分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2022, 12(11):811-814+820.
|
| [11] |
邓英春. 安徽省高含氟地下水成因及其分布特征[J]. 江淮水利科技, 2006(2):22-24.
|
| [12] |
杜向阳, 李朋昆, 阚海东. 应用综合指数法评价上海市黄浦区生活饮用水水质[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2011, 28(11):693-696.
|
| [13] |
孟昭伟, 雷佩玉, 郑晶利, 等. 2015年陕西省三大区域农村集中式供水水质监测结果分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2017, 44(19):3627-3630+3635.
|
| [14] |
马强. 菏泽市主要河流中硫酸盐分布特征及来源解析[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2022.
|
| [15] |
章美, 鲍庆汉, 吴黎明, 等. 淳安县农村生活饮用水水质影响因素分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2021, 31(7):870-872.
|
利益冲突声明 所有作者声明无利益冲突
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |