2022—2024年黄山市上消化道癌机会性筛查结果分析

何玉琢, 郑瑞丰, 程韶光, 陈义, 汪朝辉, 邓国强

安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1) : 79-84.

PDF(974 KB)
PDF(974 KB)
安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1) : 79-84. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2026.01.016
慢性病防治

2022—2024年黄山市上消化道癌机会性筛查结果分析

作者信息 +

Opportunistic screening results for upper gastrointestinal cancers in Huangshan from 2022 to 2024

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析2022—2024年黄山市上消化道癌机会性筛查结果,为优化筛查策略提供依据。方法 基于国家项目平台数据,纳入黄山市6家医院就诊患者,根据意愿进行无痛或普通内镜检查,按国家方案进行染色和活检。采用SAS 9.4软件进行统计分析,计算病理活检率、阳性病变检出率和早诊率,并按性别、年龄、染色情况、内镜类型和筛查对象来源分组比较。结果 共纳入65 373人,上消化道总病理活检率为36.79%(食管2.95%、贲门1.51%、胃33.10%);检出阳性病变1 779例,检出率为2.72%,其中早期病变340例,早诊率为19.11%。阳性病变检出率随年龄增长上升(χ2趋势=40.567,P<0.001),男性高于女性(χ2=398.289,P<0.001),住院人群高于门诊和体检人群(χ2=1 085.719,P<0.001)。化学染色和电子+化学染色组的检出率和早诊率均高于未染色和单纯电子染色组(χ2=294.726,P<0.001;χ2=137.169,P<0.001);无痛内镜组早诊率高于普通内镜组(χ2=5.363,P=0.021)。结论 黄山市上消化道癌机会性筛查检出率尚可,但早诊率偏低。应加强规范化培训和质控,推广无痛胃镜和化学染色技术,并针对男性、高龄等高危人群开展靶向健康教育,以提升早诊率和筛查效果。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the results of opportunistic screening for upper gastrointestinal cancer in Huangshan from 2022 to 2024, and to provide evidence for optimizing screening strategies. Methods Based on data from the national project platform, patients from six hospitals in Huangshan were included. Patients underwent painless or conventional endoscopy based on preference, with staining and biopsy performed according to the national protocol. Statistical analysis was conducted using SAS 9.4 software, pathological biopsy rate, positive lesion detection rate, and early diagnosis rate were calculated and compared by sex, age, staining status, endoscopy type, and source of screening subjects. Results A total of 65 373 individuals were included. The overall pathological biopsy rate for upper gastrointestinal lesions was 36.79% (esophagus: 2.95%, cardia: 1.51%, stomach: 33.10%). Positive lesions were detected in 1 779 cases, with a detection rate of 2.72%. Among these, 340 cases were early-stage lesions, with an early diagnosis rate of 19.11%. The detection rate of positive lesions increased with age (χ2trend =40.567, P<0.001), and was higher in males than in females (χ2=398.289, P<0.001). The detection rate of positive lesions was higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients and physical examination populations (χ2=1 085.719, P<0.001). The detection rate and early diagnosis rate of chemical staining group and electronic+chemical staining group were significantly higher than those in no staining group and electronic staining alone group (χ2=294.726, P<0.001; χ2=137.169, P<0.001). The early diagnosis rate of painless endoscopy group was higher than that of the conventional endoscopy group (χ2=5.363, P=0.021). Conclusion The detection rate for opportunistic screening of upper gastrointestinal cancer in Huangshan is acceptable, but the early diagnosis rate remains relatively low. Standardized training and quality control should be enhanced, along with promoting painless gastroscopy and chemical staining techniques. Targeted health education for high-risk groups, such as males and older adults, is essential to improve early diagnosis and screening effectiveness.

关键词

上消化道癌 / 机会性筛查 / 阳性病变 / 检出率 / 早诊率

Key words

Upper gastrointestinal cancer / Opportunistic screening / Positive lesions / Detection rate / Early diagnosis rate

引用本文

导出引用
何玉琢, 郑瑞丰, 程韶光, . 2022—2024年黄山市上消化道癌机会性筛查结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志. 2026, 32(1): 79-84 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2026.01.016
HE Yuzhuo, ZHENG Ruifeng, CHENG Shaoguang, et al. Opportunistic screening results for upper gastrointestinal cancers in Huangshan from 2022 to 2024[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2026, 32(1): 79-84 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2026.01.016
中图分类号: R735   

参考文献

[1]
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74(3):229-263.
[2]
姚一菲, 孙可欣, 郑荣寿. 《2022全球癌症统计报告》解读:中国与全球对比[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2024, 31(7):769-780.
[3]
Han BF, Zheng RS, Zeng HM, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4(1):47-53.
[4]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 健康中国行动(2019—2030年)[A/OL].(2019-07-15)[2025-04-15]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s3585u/201907/e9275fb95d5b4295be8308415d4cd1b2.shtml.
[5]
王贵齐, 魏文强. 上消化道癌筛查和早诊早治项目的新转变:机会性筛查[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2019, 53(11):1084-1087.
[6]
王贵齐, 魏文强. 上消化道癌筛查及早诊早治技术方案[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2020:1-151.
[7]
黄文雯, 李辉章, 陈刚, 等. 浙江省2019年至2021年上消化道癌机会性筛查结果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(7):356-362.
[8]
孙中明, 沈欢, 文进博, 等. 江苏省淮安市上消化道癌社会性筛查与机会性筛查结果比较[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2023, 32(1):33-38.
[9]
朱玲, 胡远东, 赵否曦, 等. 2009—2019年贵州省农村上消化道癌早诊早治筛查结果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2022, 31(11):903-908.
[10]
康瑞华, 刘曙正, 王一先, 等. 2013—2021年河南省淮河流域地区上消化道癌筛查效果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2024, 33(5):366-372.
[11]
林永添, 马晶昱, 相智声, 等. 2013—2022年福建省上消化道癌早诊早治结果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2024, 33(11):908-914.
[12]
刘慧敏, 钱永刚, 陈文婕, 等. 2018—2023年内蒙古自治区农村上消化道癌早诊早治筛查结果分析[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2024, 33(8):634-638.
[13]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发食管癌筛查与早诊早治方案(2024年版)和胃癌筛查与早诊早治方案(2024年版) 的通知[A/OL].(2024-06-21)[2025-04-15]. https://www.nhc.gov.cn/ylyjs/gzdt/202406/2bb28e7a39ce4734bee4e31ff5442e0f.shtml.
[14]
冯祥, 印红军, 华召来, 等. 2020—2021年上消化道癌机会性和门诊及人群筛查结果比较[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2023, 30(8):443-449.
[15]
Yu CQ, Tang HJ, Guo Y, et al. Hot tea consumption and its interactions with alcohol and tobacco use on the risk for esophageal cancer: a population-based cohort study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2018, 168(7):489-497.
This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement.Although consumption of tea at high temperatures has been suggested as a risk factor for esophageal cancer, an association has not been observed consistently, and whether any relationship is independent of alcohol and tobacco exposure has not been evaluated.To examine whether high-temperature tea drinking, along with the established risk factors of alcohol consumption and smoking, is associated with esophageal cancer risk.China Kadoorie Biobank, a prospective cohort study established during 2004 to 2008.10 areas across China.456 155 persons aged 30 to 79 years. Those who had cancer at baseline or who reduced consumption of tea, alcohol, or tobacco before baseline were excluded.The usual temperature at which tea was consumed, other tea consumption metrics, and lifestyle behaviors were self-reported once, at baseline. Outcome was esophageal cancer incidence up to 2015.During a median follow-up of 9.2 years, 1731 incident esophageal cancer cases were documented. High-temperature tea drinking combined with either alcohol consumption or smoking was associated with a greater risk for esophageal cancer than hot tea drinking alone. Compared with participants who drank tea less than weekly and consumed fewer than 15 g of alcohol daily, those who drank burning-hot tea and 15 g or more of alcohol daily had the greatest risk for esophageal cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 5.00 [95% CI, 3.64 to 6.88]). Likewise, the HR for current smokers who drank burning-hot tea daily was 2.03 (CI, 1.55 to 2.67).Tea consumption was self-reported once, at baseline, leading to potential nondifferential misclassification and attenuation of the association.Drinking tea at high temperatures is associated with an increased risk for esophageal cancer when combined with excessive alcohol or tobacco use.National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key Research and Development Program.
[16]
赫捷, 陈万青, 李兆申, 等. 中国食管癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤,2022, 31(6):401-436.
[17]
Conway E, Wu HS, Tian LW. Overview of risk factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(23):5604.
(1) Background: China has the highest esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) incidence areas in the world, with some areas of incidence over 100 per 100,000. Despite extensive public health efforts, its etiology is still poorly understood. This study aims to review and summarize past research into potential etiologic factors for ESCC in China. (2) Methods: Relevant observational and intervention studies were systematically extracted from four databases using key terms, reviewed using Rayyan software, and summarized into Excel tables. (3) Results: Among the 207 studies included in this review, 129 studies were focused on genetic etiologic factors, followed by 22 studies focused on dietary-related factors, 19 studies focused on HPV-related factors, and 37 studies focused on other factors. (4) Conclusions: ESCC in China involves a variety of factors including genetic variations, gene–environment interactions, dietary factors like alcohol, tobacco use, pickled vegetables, and salted meat, dietary behavior such as hot food/drink consumption, infections like HPV, poor oral health, gastric atrophy, and socioeconomic factors. Public health measures should prioritize genetic screening for relevant polymorphisms, conduct comprehensive investigations into environmental, dietary, and HPV influences, enhance oral health education, and consider socioeconomic factors overall as integral strategies to reduce ESCC in high-risk areas of China.
[18]
Poorolajal J, Moradi L, Mohammadi Y, et al. Risk factors for stomach cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Epidemiol Health, 2020, 42:e2020004.
OBJECTIVES: This report provides information on 14 behavioral and nutritional factors that can be addressed in stomach cancer prevention programs.METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through December 2018. Reference lists were also screened. Observational studies addressing the associations between stomach cancer and behavioral factors were analyzed. Between-study heterogeneity was investigated using the χ<sup>2</sup>, τ<sup>2</sup>, and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. The likelihood of publication bias was explored using the Begg and Egger tests and trim-and-fill analysis. Effect sizes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.RESULTS: Of 52,916 identified studies, 232 (including 33,831,063 participants) were eligible. The OR (95% CI) of factors associated with stomach cancer were as follows: <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection, 2.56 (95% CI, 2.18 to 3.00); current smoking, 1.61 (95% CI, 1.49 to 1.75); former smoking 1.43 (95% CI, 1.29 to 1.59); current drinking, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.29); former drinking, 1.73 (95% CI, 1.17 to 2.56); overweight/obesity, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.08); sufficient physical activity, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.02); consumption of fruits ≥3 times/wk, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.63); consumption of vegetables ≥3 times/wk, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79); eating pickled vegetables, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.51); drinking black tea, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.20); drinking green tea, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.97); drinking coffee, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.11); eating fish ≥1 time/wk 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.03); eating red meat ≥4 times/wk 1.31 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.96), and high salt intake 3.78 (95% CI, 1.74 to 5.44) and 1.34 (95% CI, 0.88 to 2.03), based on two different studies.CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided a clear picture of the behavioral and nutritional factors associated with the development of stomach cancer. These results may be utilized for ranking and prioritizing preventable risk factors to implement effective prevention programs.
[19]
赫捷, 陈万青, 李兆申, 等. 中国胃癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2022,北京)[J]. 中国肿瘤,2022, 31(7):488-527.
[20]
中国疾病预防控制中心, 中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心. 中国慢性病及危险因素监测报告——2018[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2021:225.
[21]
蔡心连, 黄月丽, 钟毅, 等. 2019年度广西上消化道癌机会性筛查结果分析[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2021, 13(6):662-666.
[22]
蔡心连. 2019年度广西上消化道癌机会性筛查效果评价及内镜染色方法在筛查中的临床价值[D]. 南宁: 广西医科大学, 2021.
[23]
叶颖, 香杰明, 黄爱婵, 等. 染色内镜技术在胃肠早癌检查中的应用[J]. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(23):32584-32587.
[24]
刘晓如, 黄晖, 肖爱美, 等. 无痛胃镜对早期胃癌的诊断价值[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(28):128-130.
[25]
Kawakatsu Y, Koyanagi YN, Oze I, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and digestive tract cancers: a case-control study[J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(11):3258.
Although socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with cancer risk, little research on this association has been done in Japan. To evaluate the association between SES and digestive tract cancer risk, we conducted a case-control study for head and neck, esophageal, stomach, and colorectal cancers in 3188 cases and the same number of age- and sex-matched controls within the framework of the Hospital-based Epidemiological Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center III (HERPACC III). We employed the education level and areal deprivation index (ADI) as SES indicators. The association was evaluated with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by conditional logistic models adjusted for potential confounders. Even after allowance for known cancer risk factors, the education level showed linear inverse associations with head and neck, stomach, and colorectal cancers. Compared to those educated to junior high school, those with higher education showed statistically significantly lower risks of cancer (0.43 (95% CI: 0.27–0.68) for head and neck, 0.52 (0.38–0.69) for stomach, and 0.52 (0.38–0.71) for colorectum). Consistent with these results for the educational level, the ADI in quintiles showed positive associations with head and neck, esophageal, and stomach cancers (p-trend: p = 0.035 for head and neck, p = 0.02 for esophagus, and p = 0.013 for stomach). Interestingly, the positive association between ADI and stomach cancer risk disappeared in the additional adjustment for Helicobacter pylori infection and/or atrophic gastritis status. In conclusion, a lower SES was associated with an increased risk of digestive cancers in Japan and should be considered in cancer prevention policies for the target population.

脚注

利益冲突声明 全部作者声明无利益冲突

志谢感谢黄山市人民医院、黄山区人民医院、歙县人民医院、休宁县人民医院、黟县人民医院、祁门县人民医院及区县疾控中心在上消化道癌机会性筛查及早诊早治项目工作中的辛勤付出


PDF(974 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/