目的 探讨高职护理专业学生压力、社会支持、应对方式和生活满意度的关系。方法 采用随机抽样的方法,使用领悟社会支持量表、大学生压力量表、特质应对方式问卷和多维学生生活满意度量表等工具,对阜阳市2所高职院校1 275名护理专业学生进行问卷调查并依此构建结构方程模型。结果 结构方程模型拟合优度指数理想:CMIN/DF为1.268,GFI、AGFI、RFI、NFI均大于0.9,RMSEA为0.013。压力和消极的应对方式对生活满意度具有负效应(总体效应分别为-0.374,-0.141),良好的社会支持和积极的应对方式对生活满意度具有正效应(总体效应分别为0.295,0.267)。结论 压力、社会支持和应对方式是生活满意度的重要预测变量,压力和消极的应对方式是生活满意度的危险因素,良好的社会支持和积极的应对方式有助于提升学生的生活满意度。
Abstract
Objective To explore the association between stress, social support, coping style and life satisfaction among higher vocational nursing students. Methods 1275 nursing students from 2 higher vocational colleges in Fuyang were randomly obtained by means of Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS), College Students' Stress Scale, Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ) and Multidimensional Student' Life Satisfaction scale (MSLSS). And structural equation model (SEM) was built based on the data. Results SEM revealed CMIN/DF=1.268, RMSEA=0.013, and indexes of GFI, AGFI, RFI, NFI were all above 0.9. Stress and passive coping style had passive effect on life satisfaction (the overall regression weights were -0.374 and -0.141 respectively). Good social support and positive coping style had positive effect on life satisfaction (the overall regression weights were 0.295 and 0.267 respectively). Conclusion Stress, social support and coping style are important forecast variables of life satisfaction. Stress and passive coping style are risk factors for life satisfaction, while good social support and positive coping style helps to enhance the life satisfaction of college student.
关键词
高职院校 /
生活满意度 /
压力 /
社会支持 /
应对方式 /
结构方程模型
Key words
Higher vocational college /
Life satisfaction /
Stress /
Social support /
Coping style /
Structure equation model
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Brim JA. Social network correlates of avowed happiness[J].J Nerv Ment Dis, 1974, 158(6): 432-439.
[2] Shin SH, Sok SR. A comparison of the factors influencing life satisfaction between Korean older people living with family and living alone[J].Int Nurs Rev, 2012, 59(2): 252-258.
[3] Rissanen T, Viinamäki ki H, Lehto SM, et al The role of mental health, personality disorders and childhood adversities in relation to life satisfaction in a sample of general population[J].Nord J Psychiatry, 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
[4] Shi M, Wang X, Bian Y, et al. The mediating role of resilience in the relationship between stress and life satisfaction among Chinese medical students: a cross-sectional study[J].BMC Med Educ, 2015, 15: 16.
[5] 程红,孟秀红. 高职与本科学生社会支持应对方式生活满意度比较[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(11):1299-1302.
[6] 张国华,刘言信. 安徽某高校学生生活支出与校园生活满意度的关系[J].中国学校卫生,2008,29(12):1142-1143.
[7] 汪向东,王希林,马弘. 心理卫生评定量表手册[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999(增刊):131-133.
[8] 李虹,梅锦荣. 大学生压力量表的编制[J].应用心理学,2007,18(1):27-32.
[9] 姜乾金. 领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(特刊):41-42.
[10] Huebner ES. Manual for the multidimensional students' life satisfaction scale. 2001 version[J].Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2001: 1-10.
[11] 余欣欣,郑雪. 初中生应激生活事件、社会支持、应对方式与心理症状关系的结构模型[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(2):83-86.
[12] 罗伟,孙雅娜,王滨. 大学生生活事件、应对方式和主观幸福感之间的关系[J].中国临床心理杂志,2007,15(4):405-406,429.
[13] Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support and buffering hypothesis[J].Psychol Bull, 1985,98(2): 310-357.
[14] 吴清兰,梁莎莎. 大专生社会支持、人际信任与应对方式的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2010,18(1):78-82.
PDF(876 KB)
