核型分析和染色体微阵列技术在超声软指标异常胎儿产前诊断中的应用

涂华玉, 黄道奇, 唐俊湘, 王朝红, 李景然, 朱健生

安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 376-379.

PDF(876 KB)
PDF(876 KB)
安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 376-379. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2022.05.008
论著

核型分析和染色体微阵列技术在超声软指标异常胎儿产前诊断中的应用

  • 涂华玉, 黄道奇, 唐俊湘, 王朝红, 李景然, 朱健生
作者信息 +

Application of karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with abnormal ultrasonographic soft markers

  • TU Hua-yu, HUANG Dao-qi, TANG Jun-xiang, WANG Chao-hong, LI Jing-ran, ZHU Jian-sheng
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨核型分析和染色体微阵列技术(CMA)在超声软指标异常胎儿产前诊断中的应用。方法 选取同时行核型分析和CMA检测的345例中孕期软指标异常但无明确结构畸形的单胎孕妇,对检测结果和孕妇资料进行分析。结果 345例孕妇软指标异常的病例中,孤立单项软指标152例,合并其他产前指征149例,两项及以上软指标44例,致病性染色体异常检出率分别为2.63%(4/152)、10.74%(16/149)、20.45%(9/44),3组检出率差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.932,P<0.001)。不同软指标的致病性染色体异常检出率为0.00%~21.43%,颈背部皮肤皱褶(NF ) 增厚最高(21.43%),其次是鼻骨缺失/发育不良(12.68%)。345例病例中,核型分析染色体异常检出率为7.25%(25/345),CMA检出率为14.49%(50/345);4例核型异常CMA未检出异常;CMA在核型正常病例中检出29例基因组拷贝数变异(CNV)。结论 NF增厚、鼻骨缺失/发育不良、两项及以上软指标异常或软指标合并其他产前指征胎儿有较高的致病性染色体异常检出率,建议行介入性产前诊断;核型分析和CMA的检测结果可以互相验证补充,两者结合可提供更加准确和有效的遗传学诊断。

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical application value of karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with abnormal ultrasonographic soft markers (USM). Methods A total of 345 singleton pregnant women with abnormal USM but without structural abnormalities who had both karyotyping and CMA testing were selected.Then,the test results and maternal data were analyzed. Results Among the 345 cases of abnormal USM,there were 152 cases with single USM,149 cases with other prenatal diagnosis indications,and 44 cases with multiple USM.The detection rates of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities were 2.63% (4/152),10.74% (16/149) and 20.45% (9/44),respectively.The difference in detection rates between the three groups was statistically significant (χ2= 15.932,P<0.001).The detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities with different USM ranged from 0.00% to 21.43%.The USM with the highest detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities was nuchal fold (NF) thickening (21.43%),followed by nasal bone loss/dysplasia (12.68%).In the 345 cases,the detection rate of karyotyping chromosomal abnormalities was 7.27% (25/345),and the detection rate of CMA was 14.53% (50/345).No abnormality was detected by CMA in 4 fetuses with chromosomal abnormality by karyotyping.Among cases with normal karyotypes,29 copy number variation (CNV) were detected by CMA. Conclusion The fetus with NF thickening,nasal bone loss/dysplasia,multiple USM abnormalities or single USM abnormality combined with other prenatal indications have a higher detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormality.Therefore,it is recommended to conduct interventional prenatal diagnosis.The results of karyotyping and CMA can be mutually verified and supplemented to provide a more accurate and effective genetic diagnosis for fetuses with abnormal USM.

关键词

超声软指标 / 产前诊断 / 染色体微阵列技术 / 核型分析 / 优生优育

Key words

Ultrasonographic soft marker / Prenatal diagnosis / Chromosome microarray analysis / Karyotyping / prenatal and postnatal care

引用本文

导出引用
涂华玉, 黄道奇, 唐俊湘, 王朝红, 李景然, 朱健生. 核型分析和染色体微阵列技术在超声软指标异常胎儿产前诊断中的应用[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志. 2022, 28(5): 376-379 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2022.05.008
TU Hua-yu, HUANG Dao-qi, TANG Jun-xiang, WANG Chao-hong, LI Jing-ran, ZHU Jian-sheng. Application of karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with abnormal ultrasonographic soft markers[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2022, 28(5): 376-379 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2022.05.008
中图分类号: R174   

参考文献

[1] Evans MI,Wapner RJ,Berkowitz RL.Noninvasive prenatal screening or advanced diagnostic testing:caveat emptor[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016,215(3):298-305.
[2] Agathokleous M,Chaveeva P,Poon LC,et al.Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2013,41(3):247-261.
[3] 邢爱耘.胎儿超声软指标的临床意义[J].实用妇产科杂志,2017,33(12):881-883.
[4] Shaffer LG,McGowan-Jordan J,Schmid M.ISCN 2013:An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2013) [M].Nomenclature,Basel:S.Karger AG,2013.
[5] Kearney HM,Thorland EC,Brown KK,et al.American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants[J].Genet Med,2011,13(7):680-685.
[6] Bromley B,Shipp TD,Lyons J,et al.What Is the Importance of Second‐Trimester “Soft Markers” for Trisomy 21 After an 11‐to 14‐Week Aneuploidy Screening Scan?[J].J Ultrasound Med,2014,33(10):1747-1752.
[7] 戚庆炜,王和.染色体微阵列分析技术在产前诊断中的应用专家共识[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(8):570-572.
[8] Shaffer LG,Rosenfeld JA,Dabell MP,et al.Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound[J].Prenat Diagn,2012,32(10):986-995.
[9] 马京梅,张秀慧,杨慧霞.染色体微阵列技术非胎儿染色体核型分析的唯一解决之道[J].中华检验医学杂志,2016,39(6):404-406.

基金

安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(202004j07020004);安徽医科大学青年科学基金(2021xkj110)

PDF(876 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/