目的 了解居民对社区新冠疫情防控各项举措执行情况的认知,并与社区防控总体满意感进行相关分析。方法 通过自行设计调查问卷,采用方便抽样方法对中部某省城乡社区18岁以上居民展开面对面调查。结果 共调查833人,其中649人对社区疫情防控总体满意,占77.91%。调查对象对社区疫情防控组织和协调能力、社区环境综合治理、社区健康宣传教育、社区包容与支持四个维度执行情况选择“好”的比例均大于60%,社区工作人员和志愿者服务水平选择“好”的比例为39.38%。多因素分析显示,男性(OR=1.617,95%CI:1.071～2.442),“41~50”年龄组(OR=2.640,95%CI:1.246~5.593),认为社区疫情防控组织和协调能力“好”(OR=3.425,95%CI:1.389~8.447)、社区志愿服务水平“好”(OR=2.104,95%CI:1.169~3.787)、社区整体环境治理“好”(OR=5.084,95%CI:2.098~12.320)、社区健康宣传教育“好”(OR=2.336,95%CI:1.028~5.310)与居民总体满意感显著正向相关(P<0.05)。结论 居民对多数社区疫情防控政策执行认知较好,总体满意感较高,认为执行情况越好,越可能对社区疫情防控总体感到满意。

Objective To understand the residents’ cognition about the implementation of COVID-19 prevention and control and the overall satisfaction at community level,and to analyze the correlation between them. Methods A self-designed questionnaire and convenience sampling was applied to investigate community residents over 18 years old in urban and rural communities in a province located at central China. Results A total of 833 valid questionnaires were actually collected.Among them,649 respondents were generally satisfied with community epidemic prevention and control,accounting for 77.91%.The proportion of respondents who choose “good” in anyone of the four dimensions of “organization and coordination ability about COVID-19 prevention and control”,“comprehensive management of community environment”,“community health publicity and education”,and “community inclusion and support” was more than 60%.And the proportion of respondents who choose “good” in “service level of community workers and volunteers” was 39.38%.Multivariate analysis showed that several factors were found to be positively related to the residents’ overall satisfaction.These factors were as following:male(OR=1.617,95%CI:1.071-2.442),“41-50” age group (OR=2.640,95%CI:1.246-5.593),respondents who choose “good” in the dimensions of “organization and coordination ability about COVID-19 prevention and control” (OR=3.425,95%CI:1.389-8.447),respondents who choose “good” in the dimensions of “service level of community workers and volunteers” (OR=2.104,95%CI:1.169-3.787),respondents who choose “good” in the dimensions of “comprehensive management of community environment” (OR=5.084,95%CI:2.098-12.320),and respondents who choose “good” in the dimensions of “community health publicity and education” (OR=2.336,95%CI:1.028-5.310). Conclusion Residents have a good understanding of the implementation of most community epidemic prevention and control policies,with a high overall satisfaction.They think that the better the implementation,the more likely they are to be satisfied with the overall epidemic prevention and control in the community.