早产儿听力筛查未通过的危险因素分析

王丹, 李欢欢, 徐军杨, 吴玖琳, 胡海利

安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 294-298.

PDF(769 KB)
PDF(769 KB)
安徽预防医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4) : 294-298. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2023.04.007
论著

早产儿听力筛查未通过的危险因素分析

  • 王丹1, 李欢欢1, 徐军杨1, 吴玖琳1, 胡海利2
作者信息 +

Analysis of risk factors for premature infants failing hearing screening

  • WANG Dan1, LI Huanhuan1, XU Junyang1, WU Jiulin1, HU Haili2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨早产儿听力筛查未通过的高危因素。方法 选择2020年1月1日至12月31日在合肥市妇幼保健计划生育服务中心新筛中心听力筛查门诊进行首次筛查的551例早产儿为调查对象,对其进行瞬态诱发性耳声发射(TEOAE)和自动听性脑干反应(AABR)筛查,同时采用自制的早产儿听力筛查情况调查表,收集产妇孕期情况及早产儿出生后临床资料,采用χ2单因素分析和logistic回归多因素分析早产儿听力筛查未通过的高危因素。结果 TEOAE与AABR联合筛查共筛查551人,未通过者132人,未通过率为24.0%。单因素分析显示:家庭住址、母亲分娩时年龄、是否有耳廓或外耳道畸形、听力障碍家族史、检测时月龄、孕周、矫正胎龄等方面差异有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:家庭住址为农村(OR=1.931,95%CI:1.178~3.165)、有耳廓或外耳道畸形(OR=7.524,95%CI:1.193~47.439)、有听力障碍家族史(OR=4.974,95%CI:1.348~18.354)是早产儿听力筛查未通过的危险因素,以早产儿检测时月龄≤1个月为参照,>1且≤2个月(OR=2.847,95%CI:1.090~7.433)、>2且≤3个月(OR=6.359,95%CI:2.250~17.971)、>3个月(OR=6.750,95%CI:2.343~19.449)组是早产儿听力筛查未通过的危险因素。结论 针对早产儿的听力筛查提倡采用TEOAE和AABR联合应用筛查。早产儿听力未通过率较高,多种因素影响早产儿听力筛查未通过情况。

Abstract

Objective To explore the risk factors for failing hearing screening in premature infants. Methods From January 1,2020 to December 31,2020,551 premature infants who underwent the first screening in the hearing screening clinic of the Newborn's Diseases Screening Center of Hefei Maternity & Child Health Center were selected as the investigation objects.Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) screening were performed on them.Meanwhile,the self-made hearing screening questionnaire of premature infants was used to collect their mothers' pregnancy and post-birth clinical data.Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of premature infants failing hearing screening. Results A total of 551 patients were screened by TEOAE combined with AABR,and 132 failed,with a failure rate of 24.0%.Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in home address,mother's age at delivery,whether there were auricle or external auditory canal malformation,family history of hearing impairment,months at detection,gestational age and corrected gestational age (P<0.05).The results of multi-factor analysis showed that rural home address (OR=1.931,95%CI:1.178-3.165),auricle or external auditory canal malforming (OR=7.524,95%CI:1.193-47.439),and family history of hearing impairment (OR=4.974,95%CI:1.348-18.354)were risk factors for hearing screening failure of preterm infants.Taking the age of premature infants≤1 month as reference,the three month age groups >1 and≤2 months (OR=2.847,95%CI:1.090-7.433),>2 and ≤3 months (OR=6.359,95%CI:2.250-17.971) and >3 months (OR=6.750,95%CI:2.343-19.449)were risk factors for premature infants failing hearing screening. Conclusion The combined application of TEOAE and AABR is recommended for hearing screening of premature infants.Premature infants have a high rate of hearing failure,and multiple factors affect the failure rate of hearing screening for premature infants.

关键词

早产儿 / 听力筛查 / 未通过 / 危险因素 / 多因素logistic回归分析

Key words

Premature infants / Hearing screening / Failed / Risk factors / Multivariate logistic regression analysis

引用本文

导出引用
王丹, 李欢欢, 徐军杨, 吴玖琳, 胡海利. 早产儿听力筛查未通过的危险因素分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志. 2023, 29(4): 294-298 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2023.04.007
WANG Dan, LI Huanhuan, XU Junyang, WU Jiulin, HU Haili. Analysis of risk factors for premature infants failing hearing screening[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023, 29(4): 294-298 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2023.04.007
中图分类号: R174   

参考文献

[1] 杨琨,杨希林,王燕,等.美国听力学会儿童听力筛查指南[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2017,25(2):119-136.
[2] 郝文洋,商莹莹,倪道凤,等.正常出生新生儿瞬态诱发耳声发射与畸变产物耳声发射听力筛查结果比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2018,26(3):247-250.
[3] 张峥嵘.自动听性脑干反应在新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的相关因素的研究[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(16):113-115.
[4] 高湘杰,彭晓娟,邓忠,等.新生儿听力损失高危因素与听力筛查研究进展[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2019,25(6):692-696.
[5] 吴皓,黄治物.新生儿听力筛查[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:78-81.
[6] 周津徽,张欣,王成禹,等.TEOAE 联合AABR在高危新生儿听力筛查中的价值研究[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2020,45(2):360-362.
[7] 徐孝玲,杨志红,魏健.耳声发射联合自动听性脑干反应对新生儿听力筛查的价值[J].宁夏医科大学学报,2019,41(8):853-855.
[8] 潘丹园.南宁市武鸣区2015年不同胎龄早产儿听力筛查结果分析[J].中国社区医师,2018,34(13):177-179.
[9] 涂彬.新生儿听力障碍发生情况及高危因素分析[J].包头医学院学报,2019,35(8):70-71.
[10] 赵秋华,张峥嵘,黄玲.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病患儿听力障碍发生情况及危险因素分析 [J].中国医学创新,2020,17(15):18-22.
[11] 黄翠兰,肖厚兰,李婷.不同高危因素对早产儿听力障碍的影响分析[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2018,39(1):71-73.
[12] 赵岩,王靖明,郑睿,等.高危新生儿听力筛查结果及高危因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2020,18(6):469-471.
[13] 赵洪春,车娟,张肖林,等.新生儿听力筛查结果及影响因素分析和临床指导意义[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020,18(4):734-737.
[14] 陈惠兰,赵娜,吴菲,等.不同胎龄早产儿听力筛查结果及高危因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(5):1077-1079.
[15] 刘一心,邬沃乔,刘世新,等.深圳市新生儿听力筛查情况及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2010,26(1):26-27.
[16] 刘云亮,李燕芳,张沁铭,等.2 893例早产儿听力筛查及随访研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2017,25(3):234-237.
[17] 田野,刘清明,於娟娟.耳声发射联合自动听性脑干反应在新生儿听力筛查中的应用价值[J].中外医学研究,2021,19(16):95-97.

基金

合肥市2022年应用医学研究项目(Hwk2022yb038)

PDF(769 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/