目的 了解安徽省法定传染病报告质量和管理现状,发现各级医疗卫生机构在传染病报告管理工作中存在的问题,为进一步提高法定传染病网络直报数据质量提供依据。方法 采用分阶段分层随机抽样方法在全省16个市和2个直管县抽取疾病预防控制中心(CDC)和医疗机构开展现场调查。共调查89家机构,抽查法定传染病病例1 268例。结果 安徽省各级CDC和医疗机构对传染病报告管理状况日趋完善,法定传染病报告率为95.19%,但各地传染病信息报告管理工作仍存在待改进的问题。不同级别医疗机构报告率差异无统计学意义,淮北地区报告率显著低于江淮之间地区和江南地区。综合评价结果显示,江淮之间地区CDC得分显著低于淮北地区和江南地区(t1=-4.618,P1=0.002;t2=-3.395,P2=0.013),医疗机构传染病报告管理质量综合评价指数前3位的地市为合肥市(0.9534)、铜陵市(0.9523)、马鞍山市(0.9456)。结论 安徽省法定传染病报告管理工作更加规范,报告质量进一步提高。各级各类卫生部门应进一步加强对传染病信息报告工作的管理,完善医疗机构电子病历系统建设,鼓励鼓励有条件的医疗机构积极开展与传染病网络直报系统的直接数据交换功能。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the management and quality of notifiable communicable disease reporting in Anhui province and find out existing problems for the further improvement of network direct reporting of communicable disease. Methods The evaluation was conducted by centers for disease control and prevention (CDCs) and hospitals in 16 cities and 2 directly administering counties using multistage stratified cluster sampling. A total of 89 institutions, with 1268 cases of notifiable communicable disease, were investigated. Results The administrative management in all level CDCs and hospitals had been gradually optimizing, but the problems still exist. The reporting rate for notifiable communicable disease was 95.19%. There was no significant difference of reporting rate among hospitals in different levels. The reporting rate was the lowest in Huaibei area. Comprehensive evaluation score of quality and management of notifiable communicable disease reporting in CDCs was lowest in area between Changjiang and Huaihe. The top three cities with highest comprehensive evaluation index of quality and management of notifiable communicable disease reporting in medical institutions were Hefei(0.9534), Tongling (0.9523) and Maanshan(0.9456). Conclusion The more standardized management of notifiable communicable disease network direct reporting had been conducted and quality of reporting had been greatly improved in Anhui province. It is necessary for all health institutions to continue to strengthen the management of notifiable communicable diseases network direct reporting,improve the HIS system, and encourage medical institutions with better facility to carry out direct data exchange with reporting network.
关键词
法定传染病 /
管理 /
质量 /
调查 /
评估
Key words
Notifiable communicable disease /
management /
quality /
survey /
evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 洪荣涛,吴生根,李群,等.中国大陆传染病监测与展望[J].疾病监测,2015,30(12):994-1001.
[2] Satcher D.Notifiable Disease Surveillance and Notifiable Disease Statistics- United States, June 1946 and June 1996 [J].MMWR, 1996; 45 (25): 530-532.
[3] Rubin R.US CDC celebrates 70 years [J].Lancet, 2016, 388(10057): 2224-2225.
[4] Satcher D.History of CDC [J].MMWR, 1996,45 (25): 526-530.
[5] 马家奇,赵自雄.中国疾病控制公共卫生信息化建设与展望[J].中国卫生信息管理杂志,2016,13(1):18-21.
[6] 马家奇.国家疾病网络直报系统与医院信息系统连接的公共卫生意义[J].中华预防医学杂志,2008,11(42):108-109.
[7] 国家卫生计生委疾控局.国家卫生计生委疾控局关于开展2016年法定传染病报告质量和管理现状调查的通知[EB/OL].http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/jkj/s3577/201612/2774addfb1f543baad27e73ca4f5001f.shtml.
[8] 刘永孝,赵佐兰,王靓.法定传染病疫情报告质量调查[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2005,11(3):132-134.
[9] 赵佐兰,倪守旗.安徽省2004年医疗机构法定传染病漏报调查[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2007,13(1):15-16, 50.
[10] 郭青,张春曦,王晓风,等.2013年度全国法定传染病信息报告质量和管理现状调查[J].疾病监测,2015,30(2):145-149.
[11] 史芸萍,韦再华,刘洋,等.2015年北京市法定传染病报告质量和管理现状调查[J].首都公共卫生,2016,10(4):189-192.
[12] 刘世炜,王丽萍,王晓风,等.2009年全国传染病网络直报管理与报告质量现状评估[J].疾病监测,2011,26(5):392-397.
[13] 金丽珠,葛辉,杜雪杰,等.2015 年全国医疗机构法定传染病报告质量调查分析[J].疾病监测,2016,31(10):883-886.