Objective Through the investigation and analysis of a school tuberculosis cluster epidemic in Huoshan County,the reasons for the school tuberculosis cluster epidemic were explored,and the basis for improving the prevention and control of tuberculosis in schools in Huoshan County was provided. Method Close contacts of the index case were screened by field epidemiological methods and the relevant data were analyzed. Results A total of 3 cases of students with tuberculosis were screened out,of which 2 cases had obvious epidemiological correlation with the index case and were identified as a cluster epidemic.The index case is the first case.The class of the first case (Class 18,senior 3) had a strong positive rate of 26.1% in the Purified Protein Derivative of Tuberculin (PPD) skin test.The strong positive rate of tuberculin skin test of students in adjacent classes on the same floor (Class 16,senior 3) was 11.0% (7 / 66).There was significant difference in the strong positive rate of PPD between the two classes(χ2=5.358,P=0.021).The PPD positive rate was 16.2% (6 / 37) in male students and 37.5% (12 / 32) in female students about the class of the first case,the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.031,P=0.045). Conclusion The first case is infectious.Delays in detection were the main cause of the cluster outbreak.To do well the preventive medication intervention work of close contacts of the first case can block the occurrence of the cluster outbreak.
Key words
School /
Tuberculosis /
Cluster epidemic /
Close contacts /
PPD
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会《肺结核诊断》(WS288-2017)http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fzs/s7852d/201711/0819ad8454
0b4d97a1644bbc6ec4306d.shtml.
[2] 石婧,谢彧洋,李洁,等.在校青少年结核病发病原因及对策分析[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(21):165-168.
[3] 国家卫生计生委办公厅,教育部办公厅.《学校结核病防控工作规范(2017版)》http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7914/201707/4d2f57086b65450c8f674bf07323b9ad.shtml.2017年6月26日.
[4] 都伟欣,徐苗,卢锦标,等.PPD皮肤试验方法最佳观察时间的探讨[J].检验医学与临床,2012,9(13);1604-1605.
[5] 王星,刘金红,李海,等.中学生PPD反应强度与结核发病及预防性治疗标准研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2012,17(4):665-667.
[6] 范广谦,钟湘华.免疫抑制剂和皮质激素治疗后结核病误诊二例[J].湖南医学,1989,6(2):124.
[7] 初乃惠.切实提高结核病合并相关疾病的诊断与治疗[J].中国医刊,2019,54(7):697-699.
[8] 莫靖林.学校结核病疫情防控研究进展及建议[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(11):1749-1752.
[9] 丁守华,万青灵,潘恩春.一起学校结核病聚集性疫情的流行病学调查[J].中国学校卫生,2019,40(9):1423-1425.
[10] 李君,朱小梅,单志力,等.一起学校结核病聚集性疫情调查分析[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2017,37(8):32-934.
[11] 鞠剑波.高中生结核菌素试验反应程度与结核病发病危险的队列研究[J].皮肤病与性病,2017,39(3):191-193.
[12] 李丽,杨云,夏琳,等.武汉洪山区5起高校肺结核聚集性疫情密切接触者筛查结果[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(11):1746-1747.
[13] 屠德华,刘玉清,张立兴,等.大学生预防性治疗的结核菌素反应强度标准研究[J].中国防痨杂志,2006,28(5):65-268.
[14] 莫靖林.学校结核病疫情防控研究进展及建议[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(11):1749-1752.
[15] 李金方,黄敏,张晖,等.一起学校肺结核聚集性疫情的调查与分析[J].江苏预防医学,2018,29(4):417-418.
[16] 张晓龙,王斐娴,傅颖,等.2015—2017年苏州市学校结核病聚集性疫情分调查[J].现代预防医学,2019,46(14):2634-2637.