Analysis of environmental sanitation monitoring results of 41 primary and secondary school classrooms in Jingzhou City in 2020

TIAN Xin, MENG Xiang-yuan, HE Yong, LI Jun

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 302-305.

PDF(733 KB)
PDF(733 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4) : 302-305. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2022.04.010

Analysis of environmental sanitation monitoring results of 41 primary and secondary school classrooms in Jingzhou City in 2020

  • TIAN Xin, MENG Xiang-yuan, HE Yong, LI Jun
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To understand the environmental sanitation conditions of primary and secondary school classrooms in Jingzhou City,so as to provide basis for improving the environment of primary and secondary school classrooms and ensuring the physical health of students. Methods In 2020,242 classrooms in 41 primary and secondary schools in Jingzhou City were selected by random sampling method,and health monitoring and evaluation were carried out according to relevant national health standards. Results In 41 primary and secondary schools in Jingzhou City,the qualified rate of per capita area of classroom was 42.15%,the qualified rate of average illumination of blackboard surface was 58.68%,the qualified rate of daylighting coefficient was 64.05%,the qualified rate of illumination of desk surface was 80.58%,the qualified rate of lamp desk spacing was 98.76%,the qualified rate of blackboard surface illumination uniformity was 95.87%,the qualified rate of desk surface illumination uniformity was 95.45%,and the qualified rate of blackboard reflection ratio was 90.91%.The qualified rates of per capita area of classroom (54.55%) and daylighting coefficient (89.39%) in rural primary school classrooms were significantly different from those in urban primary school classrooms (36.84% and 64.21%,respectively),and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.951,P=0.026;χ2=13.012,P<0.001).The qualified rate of average illumination of blackboard surface in rural primary school classrooms (62.12%) was lower than that of urban primary school classrooms (81.05%) (χ2=7.130,P=0.008).The qualified rate of desk surface illumination uniformity in rural primary school classrooms (92.42%) was lower than that of urban primary school classrooms (100.00%) (P = 0.011).The qualified rates of daylighting coefficient (64.29%) and average illumination of blackboard surface (46.43%) in rural middle school classrooms were higher than those in urban middle school classrooms (32.08% and 20.75%,respectively) (χ2=7.746,P=0.005;χ2=5.792,P=0.016).While the qualified rate of classroom per capita area in rural middle school classrooms (21.43%) was lower than that in urban middle school classrooms (47.17%) (χ2=5.139,P=0.023). Conclusion The current situation of classroom environmental sanitation in primary and secondary schools in the main urban area of Jingzhou City is uneven between urban and rural areas and between different school sections.The qualified rates of classroom environmental sanitation indicators such as per capita area of classroom,daylighting coefficient and average illumination of blackboard surface are relatively low.

Key words

School sanitation / Classroom environment / Primary and secondary schools

Cite this article

Download Citations
TIAN Xin, MENG Xiang-yuan, HE Yong, LI Jun. Analysis of environmental sanitation monitoring results of 41 primary and secondary school classrooms in Jingzhou City in 2020[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2022, 28(4): 302-305 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2022.04.010

References

[1] 谢丽丽,王东海,郑建刚,等.2016年江西省农村中小学校卫生现状分析[J].现代预防医学,2017,44(11):1987-1990.
[2] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 18205—2012学校卫生综合评价[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[3] 李雯婧,张嘉生,崔玲玲,等.海淀区2017年中小学校教室环境卫生学评价[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(7):1114-1116.
[4] 陆广智,肖伟华,吴和岩,等.珠海市中小学校教学与生活环境卫生监测结果分析[J].华南预防医学,2020,46(3):274-277.
[5] 钱红丹.无锡市2014—2015年学校教室和生活环境卫生现状[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(1):131-133.
[6] 杨涵深,游振磊.义务教育“大班额”:现状、问题与消减对策[J].教育学术月刊,2019(12):57-64.
[7] 伍颖华,梁侨任.2015—2019年台山市中小学校卫生监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2020,36(16):2265-2269.
[8] 钟博文,卢超淼,王秀芹,等.厦门市海沧区学校教学环境监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2016,32(12):1693-1695.
[9] 白文娟,石斌,潘新赟,等.武汉市2017年中小学教室环境卫生监测结果分析[J].医学动物防制,2019,35(7):672-674.
[10] 张静,史友欢,朱湖敏,等.2017—2018学年南京市浦口区学校教学环境卫生监测结果分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2019,25(2):142-144+157.
[11] 刘爽,彭飞,向晶晶,等.2019年湖北省中小学校生活与教学环境卫生现状分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(4):619-622.
[12] 程炼,周亮,曾婕,等.四川省79所中小学校教学环境卫生现状分析[J].现代预防医学,2019,46(16):2934-2937.
PDF(733 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/