Analysis of the influential factors of late diagnosis among newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2022

JIN Lin, ZHANG Jin, QIN Yizu, LIU Aiwen, WANG Fanghua, WU Jianjun, SHEN Yuelan

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1) : 6-10.

PDF(800 KB)
PDF(800 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1) : 6-10. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.01.002
AIDS Prevention and Treatment Special Report

Analysis of the influential factors of late diagnosis among newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2022

  • JIN Lin1,2, ZHANG Jin1,2, QIN Yizu1,2, LIU Aiwen1,2, WANG Fanghua1,2, WU Jianjun1,2, SHEN Yuelan1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To analyze the current situation and influential factors of late diagnosis of newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2022. Methods The database information of the newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2022 was obtained from the National AIDS Comprehensive Information System of China information system for disease control and prevention.6 747 cases were divided into two groups:late diagnosis and non-late diagnosis.The logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influential factors of late diagnosis. Results A total of 6 747 newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions were analyzed,and the mean age was (47.67±16.87) years.The proportion of late diagnosis was 43.38%(2 927/6 747);Moreover,the proportions of late diagnosis from 2018 to 2022 were 44.61%(571/1 280),45.70%(638/1 396),44.93%(580/1 291),41.80%(612/1 464)and 39.97%(526/1 316),respectively.Compared with the age 0 to 19 group,the groups of age 20 to 39,age 40 to 59,and age≥60 had a higher risk of late diagnosis (OR=3.212,95%CI:2.098-4.920;OR=3.946,95%CI:2.536-6.137;OR=3.589,95%CI:2.281-5.649).Compared with STD clinic,other patients testing services and preoperative examination group had a higher risk of late diagnosis (OR=2.042,95%CI:1.670-2.496;OR=1.483,95%CI:1.197-1.838).The male cases had a higher risk of late diagnosis (OR=1.446,95%CI:1.245-1.680) than that of the female cases.Compared with the high education group,the primary school or below education group,junior high school group,and senior high school group had a higher risk of late diagnosis (OR=1.353,95%CI:1.109-1.651;OR=1.378,95%CI:1.150-1.651;OR=1.277,95%CI:1.047-1.559). Conclusion The proportion of late diagnosis among newly identified HIV/AIDS cases in medical institutions in Anhui Province showed a decreasing trend,but the overall proportion is still relatively high.The main reason for late diagnosis are related to the middle-aged and elderly individuals,other testing services,male patients,and patients with lower education level.Thus,medical institutions need to provide HIV testing and consultation,expand the testing scope of key departments and inpatients,strengthen the professional training of medical personnel in medical institutions,and improve the pertinence and effectiveness of publicity knowledge.

Key words

HIV/AIDS / Medical institution / Late diagnosis / Influential factors

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIN Lin, ZHANG Jin, QIN Yizu, LIU Aiwen, WANG Fanghua, WU Jianjun, SHEN Yuelan. Analysis of the influential factors of late diagnosis among newly identified HIV/AIDS cases from medical institutions in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2022[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024, 30(1): 6-10 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.01.002

References

[1] 金怡晨,秦倩倩,蔡畅,等.中国2011—2020年新报告HIV/AIDS短期内死亡特征及风险因素[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2023,27(6):673-677.
[2] Gregori N,Renzetti S,Izzo I,et al.Does the rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy at HIV diagnosis impact virological response in a real-life setting?A single-centre experience in Northern Italy[J].AIDS Care,2023,35(12):1938-1947.
[3] Teklu AM,Delele K,Abraha M,et al.Exploratory analysis of time from HIV diagnosis to ART start,factors and effect on survival:a longitudinal follow up study at seven teaching hospitals in Ethiopia[J].Ethiop J Health Sci,2017,27(Suppl 1):17-28.
[4] 陈晨,钟明丽,成骢,等.南京地区HIV/AIDS患者一线抗病毒治疗失败相关因素分析[J].江苏大学学报(医学版),2021,31(6):506-510.
[5] 金琳,程晓莉,秦义组,等.安徽省2011—2015年新诊断HIV感染者和艾滋病患者晚发现情况及相关因素分析[J].中华预防医学杂志,2018,52(4):415-418.
[6] 金霞,熊燃,王丽艳,等.2010—2014年我国HIV感染病例的晚发现情况分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2016,37(2):218-221.
[7] 马凯芳,张晓婷,葛琳,等.2015—2019年我国新报告≥50岁HIV/AIDS患者中晚发现情况分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2022,28(1):16-20.
[8] 安徽省人民政府办公厅关于印发安徽省遏制与防治艾滋病“十三五” 行动计划的通知[J].安徽省人民政府公报,2017(14):25-32.
[9] 蒋佩杰,张晓婧,简蕊霖,等.成都市高校大学生的艾滋病知识知晓情况与行为态度水平的现状及影响因素分析[J].成都医学院学报,2023,18(6):789-794.
[10] 齐婉清,刘晓,崔爽楠,等.苏州市大学生性传播疾病知信行和健康教育需求调查[J].江苏卫生保健,2023,25(2):103-105.
[11] 张思晨,蓝建国,韦陶,等.2015年和2020年柳州市50岁及以上农村居民艾滋病知识知晓情况[J].疾病监测,2022,37(7):935-940.
[12] 刘雨会,叶运莉,冯才碧,等.泸州市农村中老年艾滋病知晓现状及影响因素分析[J].职业与健康,2023,39(19):2663-2667.
[13] 张容静,汤洪洋,农丽萍,等.广西某农村地区中老年艾滋病感染状况及已婚者性行为特征调查[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2023,37(10):1175-1181.
[14] 王海雪,徐杰,臧春鹏.2016—2021年我国医疗机构检测发现HIV/AIDS患者情况分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2023,29(2):157-160.
[15] 沈月兰,程晓莉,刘爱文,等.安徽省2010—2020年性病门诊男性就诊者HIV感染状况及影响因素分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2021,27(6):437-440+449.
[16] 林铃,李太生.解决HIV感染者晚发现的策略:以综合性医院为中心开展全病程管理治疗[J].国际流行病学传染病学杂志,2021,48(3):171-175.
[17] 杨晴,罗雅凌,胡强.江西省2014—2018年新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现情况及影响因素分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2019,25(11):1153-1156.
[18] 徐聪慧,周超,吴国辉,等.重庆市2012—2017年新报告HIV/AIDS病人样本来源及晚发现情况分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2019,25(9):964-965+967.
[19] 江光煚,郭巍,裴迎新,等.重庆市部分地区50岁及以上中老年人非婚性行为及HIV感染状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(11):1438-1442.
[20] 李洪福,王华丽.医务人员艾滋病防治知识和歧视状况及其影响因素分析[J].预防医学论坛,2023,29(10):775-781.
[21] 岳清,严莉萌,王燕婷.性病门诊就诊者性病艾滋病知识知晓率与健康教育需求调查[J].预防医学,2018,30(9):958-960.
PDF(800 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/