Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Field Epidemiology Training Program in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024

ZHAO Xiaodong, WU Shenggen, ZHAO Xiaoyun

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6) : 511-514.

PDF(744 KB)
PDF(744 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6) : 511-514. DOI: 10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.06.018
Public Health Management

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Field Epidemiology Training Program in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024

  • ZHAO Xiaodong, WU Shenggen, ZHAO Xiaoyun
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To understand the training effectiveness and training needs of the Fujian Province Field Epidemiology Training Program (FJFETP),and provide reference for further improving FETP. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 104 graduated trainees of the FETP in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024.and R.4.4.1 software was used for data organization and statistical analysis. Results A total of 5 FETP sessions were held in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024,with 104 graduates,covering 9 cities,1 comprehensive experimental zone,and 63 counties (cities,districts) in the province.The coverage rate of counties (cities,districts) reached 73.26% (63/86).Among the 104 graduating students,67.31% (70 /104) came from the county (city,district) level CDC,98.08% (102/104) believed that their overall work ability had been improved after the training,42.31% (44/104) chose the Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention as the best spot to practice on-site during the training period,and 95.19% (99/104) chose professional and technical personnel from disease control institutions as instructors during the centralized period.Among the eight ability enhancement evaluations,"the ability to independently organize complex on-site epidemiological investigations in the event of disease outbreaks or emergency health events" scored the highest at 7.46 points.The score after training was (71.50±22.60) points,which was higher than the score before training [(42.30 ± 20.00) points],and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.864,P<0.001). Conclusion The overall work ability of FJFETP graduates has been greatly improved,and further improvements are needed in training instructors,training models,and funding guarantee mechanisms to ensure the high-quality promotion of FJFETP.

Key words

Field Epidemiology / Training / Effectiveness evaluation

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHAO Xiaodong, WU Shenggen, ZHAO Xiaoyun. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Field Epidemiology Training Program in Fujian Province from 2020 to 2024[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024, 30(6): 511-514 https://doi.org/10.19837/j.cnki.ahyf.2024.06.018

References

[1] 曾光.我国已建立中国现场流行病学培训项目[J].中华流行病学杂志,2002,23(1):67.
[2] 谭嘉.施国庆.从事现场流行病学要有一种精神[N].健康报,2015-01-09(007).
[3] 冯琳,吕梅.中国现场流行病学培训项目在公共卫生应急人才培养中的作用[J].中国公共卫生管理,2010,26(3):245-246.
[4] 吕繁,李立明.现场流行病学培训项目及其发展[J].中国预防医学杂志,2001,2(4):336-343.
[5] 吴家兵.安徽省突发急性传染病防控现状与策略展望[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2024,30(3):173-178+194.
[6] 李东悦,曾四清,李健,等.广东省现场流行病学培训项目培训效果评估[J].继续医学教育,2008,22(5):6-9.
[7] 杜莹,陈若男,于洁,等.天津市一线现场流行病学培训效果评估[J].职业与健康,2023,39(3):410-413.
[8] 卢昊,涂画.湖北省一线人员现场流行病学培训项目发展分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2024,40(2):219-221.
[9] 朱传泰,刘作功.山东省现场流行病学培训效果评价[J].预防医学论坛,2005,11(6):683-685.
[10] 宋律,侯赛,杜金,等.基于学员自评的安徽省现场流行病学培训项目效果分析[J].预防医学,2020,32(5):533-535+538.
[11] 姚兰,王志锋.贵州省现场流行病学培训效果评价[J].贵州医药,2011,35(11):1027-1029.
[12] 陈奕,许国章,史玮,等.宁波市现场流行病学培训项目效果评价[J].中国公共卫生管理,2012,28(1):30-31.
[13] 王安娜,赵芳芳,冀国强,等.北京市顺义区现场流行病学培训项目效果评价[J].首都公共卫生,2016,10(5):238-240.
[14] 杨莉.中国现场流行病学培训项目责任导师制实施现状调查[D].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2019.
[15] 曹宁,高玉敏,李海玲,等.案例教学法在现场流行病学中的应用[J].基础医学教育,2022,24(5):326-329.
PDF(744 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/