PDF(749 KB)
Quality analysis of suspected occupational diseases network reports in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 2018 to 2022
GU Yun, XU Jie, LUO Qiong, WANG Meilin
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2) : 123-127.
PDF(749 KB)
PDF(749 KB)
Quality analysis of suspected occupational diseases network reports in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from 2018 to 2022
Objective To understand the quality of suspected occupational diseases online reports in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Ningxia),to identify the risk points of report quality and provide a basis for improving the quality of online reports. Methods A stratified proportional sampling method was used to select 38 occupational health examination institutions from 5 cities in Ningxia,and a survey of delayed reporting and missed reporting was conducted on their suspected occupational diseases reported online from January 1,2018 to December 31,2022.A database was established by using Excel 2019,and statistical analysis was conducted by using SPSS 22.0. Results From 2018 to 2022,38 occupational health examination institutions in Ningxia reported a total of 880 suspected cases of occupational diseases.There were 318 cases of late reporting,with a late reporting rate of 36.14%.There were 30 cases of underreporting,with an underreporting rate of 3.30%.The delayed reporting rates from 2018 to 2022 were 2.60% (5/192),25.83% (31/120),73.12% (68/93),34.95% (72/206) and 52.79% (142/269),respectively,showed an upward trend (χ${}_{trend}^{2}$=41.966,P<0.001).The underreporting rates from 2018 to 2022 were 2.54% (5/192),3.23% (4/120),3.13% (3/93),1.90% (4/206) and 4.95% (14/269),with no statistically significant difference (PFisher=0.395).The regional distribution was mainly dominated by Yinchuan and Shizuishan,accounting for 49.09% (432/880) and 32.61% (287/880),the delayed reporting rates were 37.73% (163/432) and 37.63% (108/287),and the missed reporting rates were 2.48% (11/432) and 3.37% (10/287),respectively.The distribution of reporting institutions was mainly composed of public institutions and private institutions,accounting for 73.18% (644/880) and 26.59% (234/880),the delayed reporting rates were 41.15% (265/644) and 22.65% (53/234).The underreporting was mainly found in enterprise hospitals and private institutions,with underreporting rates of 100.00% (2/2) and 6.77% (17/234).The suspected occupational diseases were mainly occupational pneumoconiosis and occupational ear,nose,throat,and oral diseases,accounting for 59.55% (524/880) and 32.05% (282/880),respectively,the delayed reporting rates were 27.48% (144/524) and 54.96% (155/282),and the missed reporting rates were 3.50% (19/524) and 1.74% (5/282),respectively.The inconsistency rate of chest X-ray conclusions among workers exposed to dust was 23.79% (285/1 198),and the inconsistency rate of physical examination conclusions was 28.21% (338/1 198).The inconsistency rate of hearing results among workers exposed to noise was 10.78% (143/1 327),and the inconsistency rate of physical examination conclusions was 50.49% (670/1 327). Conclusion The delayed and underreporting rates of suspected occupational diseases reports in Ningxia are relatively high.It is necessary to accelerate the construction of provincial-level information platforms,strengthen the supervision of occupational diseases health examination institutions,stabilize the team of occupational diseases network reporting personnel,and improve the quality of network reporting of suspected occupational diseases.
Occupational diseases / Suspected occupational diseases / Underreporting / Delayed reporting / Online reporting
| [1] |
国家卫生健康委员会. 疑似职业病界定标准:GBZ/T325—2022[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2022.
|
| [2] |
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 职业健康检查管理办法[EB/OL].(2019-12-24) [2024-10-01]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-12/24/content_5463475.htm.
|
| [3] |
中国疾病预防控制中心. 职业健康检查质量控制规范(试行)[EB/OL].(2019-05-14) [2024-10-01]. https://nirp.chinacdc.cn/fgbz/bmgz/202403/W020240307517480513769.pdf.
|
| [4] |
中国疾病预防控制中心. 职业病报告技术规范[EB/OL].(2019-12-09) [2024-10-01]. https://www.whzfy.org.cn/view/570.html.
|
| [5] |
陈葆春. 安徽省2014—2023年报告新发职业病特征及应对策略[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2024, 30(6):431-436+441.
|
| [6] |
刘磊, 唐昆, 程婷婷, 等. 六安市2018—2022年重点职业病监测结果分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2023, 29(6):477-482.
|
| [7] |
查晚生, 陈葆春, 胡琼, 等. 安徽省2012—2016年职业病发病情况分析[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2018, 24(1):63-66.
|
| [8] |
金楠, 左超, 王小晳. 2015—2017年重庆市疑似职业病报告情况分析[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2019, 32(5):394-395.
|
| [9] |
商维维, 卢响响, 邱婉月, 等. 2015—2022年四川省疑似职业病报告病例特征及诊断情况分析[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2023, 39(8):894-900.
|
| [10] |
柳安琪, 王丹, 李欣欣, 等. 2018至2020年全国职业病漏报迟报情况调查及分析[J]. 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志, 2023, 41(5):353-357.
|
| [11] |
傅筱, 林青, 连郁雯. 福建省2017年职业卫生信息网络报告情况分析[J]. 海峡预防医学杂志, 2019, 25(4):75-77.
|
| [12] |
王丹, 朱晓俊, 肖培. 诊断机构职业病报告质量控制要素分析[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2017, 30(2):94-97+114.
|
| [13] |
王小皙, 袁方, 金楠. 2015—2017年重庆市职业病网络直报情况分析[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2019, 32(1):51-53.
|
| [14] |
徐昇, 刘怀志, 汪洋. 德阳市职业病报告漏报调查[J]. 职业与健康, 2017, 33(5):685-687.
|
| [15] |
王丹, 朱晓俊, 李涛. 职业病网络报告系统用户权限管理现状及对策[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2019, 32(3):163-166+184.
|
| [16] |
王小皙, 袁方, 金楠. 2015—2017年重庆市职业病网络直报情况分析[J]. 中国工业医学杂志, 2019, 32(1):51-53.
|
| [17] |
邓云珺, 李风琴, 李旭春. 职业病网络报告审核中存在的主要问题与对策[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2018, 22(28):4054-4055.
|
| [18] |
林琳, 肖培. 职业病报告漏报调查方法探讨[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2015, 16(6):496-498.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |