Comparison of microwave and wet digestion method for determination of total arsenic in food

JIANG Gen, LIU Zheng-xiang, LI Ya-wei

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2016, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5) : 308-311.

PDF(810 KB)
PDF(810 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2016, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5) : 308-311.

Comparison of microwave and wet digestion method for determination of total arsenic in food

  • JIANG Gen, LIU Zheng-xiang, LI Ya-wei
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore effects of microwave digestion and wet digestion method in the pretreatment of food (rice noodles and flour) on determination of total arsenic in food. Methods According to the national standard second GB 5009.11-2014 method (hg-afs), microwave digestion and wet digestion method for the determination of total arsenic in quality control samples and sample digestion was used. Results Determination of total arsenic was tested in food by two methods. When its content was 0.726mg/kg, the precision and accuracy (recovery rate was 112~115%, RSD<2%) was both higher. There was no significant difference in the test results of the samples (t=0.723,P>0.05). When its content was 0.317mg/kg, the accuracy of wet digestion test was very high (RSD<2%, z≤2). The total arsenic content was 0.222mg/kg detected by microwave digestion method, which was 70% of the quality control sample(RSD=2.8%).The difference between the two methods was statistically significant (t=7.491, P<0.05). According to the national standard, the total arsenic content in cereal limit was 0.5 mg/kg. This experiment with this value was as a boundary value. The sample with value less than 0.5 mg/kg was called sample with low total arsenic content, and sample with value higher than 0.5 mg/kg was called sample with high total arsenic content. Conclusion When the total arsenic content was high, the methods of microwave digestion and wet one in the pretreatment of food (rice noodles and flour) were in good agreement. When the total arsenic content was low, the wet digestion method was reliable.

Key words

Microwave digestion / Wet digestion / Atomic fluorescence spectrometry / Food safety / Risk monitoring / Arsenic

Cite this article

Download Citations
JIANG Gen, LIU Zheng-xiang, LI Ya-wei. Comparison of microwave and wet digestion method for determination of total arsenic in food[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016, 22(5): 308-311

References

[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. GB 5009.11-2014食品安全国家标准 食品中总砷及无机砷的测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
[2] 黎源倩,叶蔚云.食品理化检验第2版. [M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2015:24-28.
[3] 原中华人民共和国卫生部.GB 2762-2012 食品安全国家标准 食品中污染物限量[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[4] 安建博,沈讷敏,张祎玮,等.原子荧光法测定食品中总砷的3种前处理法比较[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2015,5:520-524.
[5] 安建博,沈讷敏,张祎玮,等.原子荧光法中微波消解、干灰化前处理法测定食品中总砷的结果对比[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2015,11:1746-1748,1753.
[6] 熊升伟,付爱华,姜涛,等. 微波消解法和电热板加热消解法测定富硒大米中的硒[J]. 粮食储藏,2015,5:28-30.
[7] 吴艳,帅文林,陈大志.不同前处理条件对水产品中总砷含量的影响[J].广州化工,2010,8:206-207.
PDF(810 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/