Explore on the evaluation method of the comprehensive quality index for notifiable infectious diseases report management in medical institutions

LIU Yong-xiao, ZHAO Yu-qiu, DENG Shu, QIU Yan, ZHANG Jin, LIU Hong

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 301-304.

PDF(989 KB)
PDF(989 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5) : 301-304.

Explore on the evaluation method of the comprehensive quality index for notifiable infectious diseases report management in medical institutions

  • LIU Yong-xiao, ZHAO Yu-qiu, DENG Shu, QIU Yan, ZHANG Jin, LIU Hong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of index evaluation method in the quality evaluation of infectious disease reporting management. Methods A total of 55 hospitals at different levels were selected and investigated by contents of organizational system construction, registration and feedback of notifiable communicable disease, reporting rate, reporting timeliness rate, completeness and accuracy of reporting cards. Comprehensive evaluation index system to the management and quality of notifiable communicable diseases reporting in medical institutions was established. Expert interview method was performed to determine the index system and weight, comprehensive evaluation index was conducted to evaluate management and quality of notifiable communicable disease reporting. Results The comprehensive evaluation index of 55 institutions was 0.9141, there was significant difference in different areas (F=2.858, P=0.004), but wasn’t at different levels (F=0.126, P=0.944). The comprehensive evaluation index among institutions with higher reporting rate or reporting timeliness rate were not significantly higher than institutions with lower. Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation index system is practical and operable to assess management and quality of notifiable communicable disease reporting in medical institutions.

Key words

Notifiable disease / Medical institutions / Report quality / Evaluation index

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Yong-xiao, ZHAO Yu-qiu, DENG Shu, QIU Yan, ZHANG Jin, LIU Hong. Explore on the evaluation method of the comprehensive quality index for notifiable infectious diseases report management in medical institutions[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2017, 23(5): 301-304

References

[1] 吴郁琴.公共卫生视野下的国家政治与社会变迁—以民国时期江西省为中心[D].上海:上海师范大学,2011年11月.
[2] 王丽萍,郭岩,郭青,等.2005-2008年中国法定传染病网络直报质量评价[J].疾病监测,2010,25(11):912-914.
[3] 郭青,张春曦,王晓风,等.2013年度全国法定传染病信息报告质量和管理现状调查[J].疾病监测,2015,30(2):145-149.
[4] 李羚,刘润友,许军红,等.2016年四川省医疗机构法定传染病报告质量调查分析[J].寄生虫病与感染性疾病,2017,15(2):97-101.
[5] 徐兰英,杨雯雯,李肖红等2012-2015年郑州市法定传染病网络直报质量评价[J].江苏预防医学杂志,2017,28(4):475-476.
[6] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会.传染病信息报告管理规范(2015版)[Z].2015-11-11.
[7] 尤恩情,张磊,吴金菊,等.合肥市病毒性肝炎网络报告数据质量分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2017,23(3):150-153.
[8] 王卫军,欧柱宁.2010-2015年广西钦州市医疗机构传染病报告质量[J].职业与健康,2017,33(5):661-665.
[9] 徐蕾.综合指数评价法在地表水饮用水源地水质评价中的应用[J].农业与科技,2013,33(4):36-37.
[10] 蒋火华,梁德华.综合污染指数评价与水质类别判定的关系[J].中国环境监测,1999,(6):48-64.
[11] 周淼,李维刚,易灵.四种水质评价方法的特点分析与比较研究[J].环境科学与管理,2016,41(12):173-177.
PDF(989 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/