Meta analysis of curative effect of minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and small bone window hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

HUANG Xiao-jiao, CHEN Sheng

Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 33-39.

PDF(2069 KB)
PDF(2069 KB)
Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1) : 33-39.

Meta analysis of curative effect of minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and small bone window hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

  • HUANG Xiao-jiao, CHEN Sheng
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the efficacy between minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and small bone window hematoma for patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Such databases as CNKI,VIP and Wanfang Data was searched to identify on minimally invasive hematoma puncture and small bone window hematoma for patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage from January 2014 to July 2017. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, independent screening literature, data extraction and evaluation of methodological quality were included in the study. RevMan5.0 software was used for Meta analysis. Results A total of 1 379 patients were included in the final 11 articles. The results of Meta analysis showed that, minimally invasive was superior to small bone window with significant difference in the total effective rate OR=1.96, 95%CI(1.34,2.86,P=0.0005), postoperative ADL grade (grade I and V), postoperative rebleeding OR=0.46,95%CI(0.30,0.72),P=0.0007, incidence of respiratory tract infection OR=0.67,95%CI(0.48,0.93),P=0.02 and postoperative mortality OR=0.56, 95%CI(0.36, 0.88),P=0.01. Conclusion For patients with moderate hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, minimally invasive hematoma aspiration surgery is more effective than small bone flap hematoma removal, which can reduce postoperative complications and mortality, and can reduce neurological impairment and improve patients' living ability in the long run.

Key words

Minimal invasive / Small bone window / Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage / Meta-analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Xiao-jiao, CHEN Sheng. Meta analysis of curative effect of minimally invasive hematoma aspiration and small bone window hematoma evacuation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2018, 24(1): 33-39

References

[1] 黎文欢.高血压脑出血外科治疗进展[J].华夏医学,2008,21(3):582-584.
[2] 脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):381-383.
[3] 胡朝辉,钱卫添,肖伟利,等.微创穿刺术与小骨窗侧裂入路显微手术治疗基底节脑出血的疗效比较[J].中国伤残医学,2014,22(10):10-12.
[4] 杨永红,陈星玲,贺学龙.微创穿刺术与小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压脑出血疗效和并发症比较分析[J].中华高血压杂志,2015,1(23):60-61.
[5] 刘干忠,高太平.微创穿刺术与小骨窗开颅术治疗中等量高血压脑出血的疗效比较[J].临床医学工程,2015,22(6):733-734.
[6] 刘存.高血压脑出血行微创穿刺术与开颅术的临床比较[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(8):1019-1020.
[7] 傅殷云.微创穿刺术与小骨窗开颅术治疗中等量高血压脑出血的疗效比较[J].中国社区医师,2016,32(9):34-35.
[8] 王东兵,高广伟.微创锥颅血肿引流术与小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压脑出血的效果比较[J].健康医学研究与实践,2016,13(6):42-44.
[9] 万海涛,严畅,平君,等.微创钻孔引流术与小骨窗开颅术治疗中等量高血压脑出血的疗效比较[J].立体定向和功能性神经外科杂志,2016,29(2):115-116.
[10] 贾振锋.小骨窗血肿清除术与微创血肿穿刺术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效对比研究[J].临床合理用药,2016,9(7C):101-102.
[11] 杨永红,找旺,贺学农.微创穿刺术与小骨窗开颅术治疗高血压脑出血临床疗效比较[J].现代医药卫生,2017,33(5):738-740.
[12] 宋红伟,张小霞.微创钻孔引流术与小骨窗开颅术治疗中等量基底节区高血压脑出血的临床效果[J].现代诊断与治疗,2017,28(12):2170-2171.
[13] 王吉锋.微创钻孔引流术与小骨窗开颅术治疗中等量基底节区脑出血的疗效观察[J].中国疗养医学,2017,26(1):70-72.
[14] Qureshi AI,Mendelow AD,Hanley DF,et al.Intracerebal haemorrhage[J].Lancel,2009,373(9675):1632-1644.
[15] Lehecka M,Dashti R,Laakso A,et al.Microneurosurgical management of anterior choroid artery aneurysms[J].World Neurosurg,2010,73(5):486-499.
[16] Ma L,Liu WG,Sheng HS,et al.Decompressive craniectomy in addition to hematoma evacuation improves mortality of patients with spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage[J].J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2010,19(4):294-298.
[17] 杨君,魏进旺,梁启龙,等.小骨窗开颅与立体定向穿刺手术治疗高血压脑出血的对比分析[J].甘肃医药,2014,33(1):88-92.
PDF(2069 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/