Objective To evaluate the quality on the network reporting death data in Anhui national disease surveillance points (DSPs), analyze the existing problems. Methods A stratified cluster random sampling method was used to evaluate the quality of the network reporting death data in Anhui DSPs from 2013 to 2017. Results From 2013 to 2017, the average annual accuracy rate of identity card number (ID), the death-causes chain, the basic death cause and code of the network reporting death data in Anhui DSPs was 85.83%,64.14% and 82.19%, respectively. Of them, the accuracy rate of the first two indexes increased year by year (P<0.05), the accuracy rate of the third index in 2017 increased by 2.77% compared with that in 2013.The accuracy rate of the three indexes between new DSPs and old DSPs was shrinking year by year.The same is true between urban and rural areas. With the exception of the accuracy rate of the basic death cause and code, the accuracy rate of other index in new DSPs were better than that of old DSPs. Between urban and rural areas, the accuracy rate of ID in urban areas was higher,the accuracy rate of the death-causes chain in rural areas was higher, and there was no difference on the accuracy rate of the basic death cause and code.The loss or error of disease code in the death-causes chain and the inaccuracy of multiple death-causes chain were the main types of errors in the death-cause reporting. Conclusion From 2013 to 2017, the quality of the network reporting death data in Anhui DSPs is constantly improving, but there is still room for improvement.While strengthening training and supervision,CDC at all levels should strictly control the quality of audit work, and regularly carry out sampling audit work,in order to find and solve problems timely.
Key words
Death surveillance /
National disease surveillance points /
Sampling audit /
Quality evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] LIU SW, WU XL, LOPEZ AD, et al. An integrated national mortality surveillance system for death registration and mortality surveillance, China[J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2016, 94(1): 46-57.
[2] 贺琴,陈叶纪,戴丹,等.安徽省2013年居民死因分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(9):976-982.
[3] 赵军,朱丽萍,谢昀,等.江西省2014-2016年死因监测常规与抽查质量评价[J].江西医药,2017,52(11):1233-1235.
[4] 底秀娟,轩水丽,李少芳.2012年河南省县级及县以上医疗机构死亡病例报告质量评价[J].当代医学,2014,20(14):148-150.
[5] 张晓平.2006~2011年太原市居民死因监测数据质量分析[J].预防医学论坛,2014,20(2):101-104.
[6] 郑艳泽,王良友,乔冬菊,等.台州市2013年死因监测数据质量评价[J]. 中国预防医学杂志,2015,16(3):237-240.
[7] 邢秀雅,贺琴,陈叶纪,等.安徽省2013~2014年全国疾病监测系统死因监测数据质量评价[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2016,22(6):384-390,427.
[8] 封宝琴,张燕萍,齐惠萍,等.死因监测质量评价方法及应用[J].疾病监测,2007,22(3):203-205.